1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(98)00053-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust design of gas and liquid micropumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to have reliable pumping, self-priming and bubble tolerance of the pump, a flexible membrane with large deflection amplitude is important [18]. The PDMS elastomer Sylgard 184 (Dow Corning Corp., Midland, Michigan, USA) has been chosen for its high flexibility and its compatibility with a hot sterilization treatment (130 • C).…”
Section: Membrane Fabrication and Final Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to have reliable pumping, self-priming and bubble tolerance of the pump, a flexible membrane with large deflection amplitude is important [18]. The PDMS elastomer Sylgard 184 (Dow Corning Corp., Midland, Michigan, USA) has been chosen for its high flexibility and its compatibility with a hot sterilization treatment (130 • C).…”
Section: Membrane Fabrication and Final Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, for a membrane deflection of 200 lm, the compression ratio is >0.2. This high renders our pump self-priming and bubble tolerant (Richter et al 1998). The large membrane deflection amplitude and the self-priming capability of our micropump are a clear advantage offered by the use of a silicone elastomer and long range magnetic actuation forces, when compared to the use of a more rigid silicon membrane with piezoelectric actuation.…”
Section: Design and Theorymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Results show that the maximum net flow of the micropump is up to 8 ml/min, and the geometric size of the micropump is 20 × 16 × 2.3 mm [9]. The robust design method of the gas micropump has been studied by Richte [10].…”
Section: Shock and Vibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model, a unit driving voltage is applied, and the external pressure load on the actuator is zero. The volume change Δ is calculated by ANSYS 10.0, then can be obtained by (10), and = −1.5275 − 012 m 3 CJ −1 . Then the load applied on the finite element model is changed.…”
Section: Dynamic Driving Characteristics Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%