2016
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.3535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust containment control in a leader-follower network of uncertain Euler-Lagrange systems

Abstract: Summary A distributed controller is developed that yields cooperative containment control of a network of autonomous dynamical systems. The networked agents are modeled with uncertain nonlinear Euler–Lagrange dynamics affected by an unknown time‐varying exogenous disturbance. The developed continuous controller is robust to input disturbances and uncertain dynamics such that asymptotic convergence of the follower agents' states to the dynamic convex hull formed by the leaders' time‐varying states is achieved. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed by the authors in recent preliminary investigations, simple model‐independent controllers of the form in (), and in , have an advantage in the sense that they are easier to study in the event‐based framework. This is in contrast to the complex model‐independent controllers in .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As observed by the authors in recent preliminary investigations, simple model‐independent controllers of the form in (), and in , have an advantage in the sense that they are easier to study in the event‐based framework. This is in contrast to the complex model‐independent controllers in .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Using global knowledge to design control gains for coordination of Euler–Lagrange networks is also reported in, for example, , and for coordination of directed networks where agents have general nonlinear dynamics described by Lipschitz continuous functions . Semi‐global results in consensus literature include , and can arise when the agent dynamics are modelled by nonlinear functions which are not globally Lipschitz (Assumption A4 indicates that typical Euler–Lagrange systems do not satisfy this global Lipschitz condition).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The containment errors could converge to a neighborhood of the origin by the proposed algorithm. It should be noted that the aforementioned results in the works of Yang et al, Mei et al, Klotz et al, Mei et al, and Yoo could only guarantee the asymptotic convergence, which, however, cannot satisfy the request for the convergence rate in some situations. Thus, the methods to speed up the convergence are of great value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , finite‐time containment of multiple Euler–Lagrange systems was investigated by using tools from homogeneity theory. Containment of multiple uncertain Euler–Lagrange systems was further studied in by designing some non‐smooth controllers. In particular, the authors in studied the case with parametric uncertainties while the authors of discussed the case with time‐varying nonlinear exogenous disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Containment of multiple uncertain Euler–Lagrange systems was further studied in by designing some non‐smooth controllers. In particular, the authors in studied the case with parametric uncertainties while the authors of discussed the case with time‐varying nonlinear exogenous disturbances. Most of aforementioned results are concerned about containment of MASs with integrators‐type agent dynamics or nonlinear node dynamics described by second‐order Euler–Lagrange systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%