2017
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package ‘dagitty’

Abstract: Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs), which offer systematic representations of causal relationships, have become an established framework for the analysis of causal inference in epidemiology; often being used to determine covariate adjustment sets for minimizing confounding bias. DAGitty is a popular web application for drawing and analysing DAGs. Here we introduce the R package ÔdagittyÕ, which provides access to all of the capabilities of the DAGitty web application within the R platform for statistical computing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
1,049
0
19

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,092 publications
(1,077 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
1,049
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…For each treatment exposure (pulmonary toxic chemotherapy, chest radiation, and thoracic surgery), unadjusted and adjusted models were fitted. We used directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) implemented in DAGitty to select a minimal sufficient adjustment set of variables to allow estimation of an unconfounded effect of each treatment exposure on respiratory admissions From the DAG (available at http://dagitty.net/m6dZKD2) the minimal sufficient adjustment set included deprivation, diagnosis age, diagnosis year, diagnostic group and treatment exposures. Further models were examined including an interaction term between age group (children and AYA) and pulmonary toxic chemotherapy and chest radiation to determine whether the association between treatment and risk of admission differed by age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each treatment exposure (pulmonary toxic chemotherapy, chest radiation, and thoracic surgery), unadjusted and adjusted models were fitted. We used directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) implemented in DAGitty to select a minimal sufficient adjustment set of variables to allow estimation of an unconfounded effect of each treatment exposure on respiratory admissions From the DAG (available at http://dagitty.net/m6dZKD2) the minimal sufficient adjustment set included deprivation, diagnosis age, diagnosis year, diagnostic group and treatment exposures. Further models were examined including an interaction term between age group (children and AYA) and pulmonary toxic chemotherapy and chest radiation to determine whether the association between treatment and risk of admission differed by age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariable analyses were planned a priori using minimum sufficient adjustment sets derived from directed acyclic graphs of the hypothesized relationships among variables related to outcomes. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regressions were used for CMV‐I, CMV‐D, and mortality outcomes, and linear regression was used for models with continuous outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We run first a minimally adjusted Model 1 including sex, age, and centre (all exposures). Model 2 was adjusted by the minimally sufficient adjustment set, determined using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) implemented in DAGitty software, available free on http://www.dagitty.net. The DAGs were built by identifying known factors affecting each of our exposures on SI (see DAGs in Supporting Information, Figure S1A–D).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%