2009
DOI: 10.1109/tbc.2008.2008712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and Accurate Frequency and Timing Synchronization Using Chirp Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, a burst of 1s chirp signal with a bandwidth of 200Hz to 20kHz was generated and sent to each subject for 3 times at each position. After the sound signal was recorded at two ear canals, HRTFs could be calculated using a FFT-based synchronization method [30]. Finally, 20 HRTFs were obtained for each subject and used for mode adaptation.…”
Section: Subjective Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a burst of 1s chirp signal with a bandwidth of 200Hz to 20kHz was generated and sent to each subject for 3 times at each position. After the sound signal was recorded at two ear canals, HRTFs could be calculated using a FFT-based synchronization method [30]. Finally, 20 HRTFs were obtained for each subject and used for mode adaptation.…”
Section: Subjective Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling type DFRFT algorithm has been used for generating this timing metric [139]. It is clearly visible from the plots that the timing metric of FRFT based method has a sharp peak with no side peaks as appear [129][130][131][132][133][134], the carrier frequency offset is usually divided in two parts (a) the fractional frequency offset (FFO); (b) the integer frequency offset (IFO). The first algorithm for frequency offset estimation using preamble was given by Moose [120] in 1994.…”
Section: Data-aided Timing Offset Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach demonstrated here does not require a measurement and calibration of the symmetrical path delay [8] and can be integrated easily into standard setups for optical frequency transfer. Also, it does not require a specialized correlator to exploit pseudo-random codes [5,6] or intricate chirps [14]. The timing offset is obtained directly from the difference of the frequencies measured at both ends of the links.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%