2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10772-016-9354-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust acoustic bird recognition for habitat monitoring with wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acoustic data obtained at fixed locations over time provides knowledge about ecosystem cycles and the data obtained from different locations can be compared. Their main limitations are the environmental noise and the energy consumption on sensors, requiring monitoring methods with low energy consumption [25].…”
Section: Wireless Acoustic Sensor Network For Wildlife Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic data obtained at fixed locations over time provides knowledge about ecosystem cycles and the data obtained from different locations can be compared. Their main limitations are the environmental noise and the energy consumption on sensors, requiring monitoring methods with low energy consumption [25].…”
Section: Wireless Acoustic Sensor Network For Wildlife Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementary devices could be digital camera [5,21], weather station [5,33] and radar detector [21,28,31,33] being additional source information supporting acoustical bird monitoring process. Hardware equipment is more and more often connected in sensor networks [28]. An interesting device is a balloon where the electronic equipment can be placed [29].…”
Section: Acoustical Bird Monitoring -State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar method to HMM is GMM [9,22] -also often used by researchers. Another methods include ANN [28], SVM [30] and DTW [15].…”
Section: Acoustical Bird Monitoring -State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with two classical methods, the results show that the Segmental signal to noise ratio (SegSNR), mean square error (MSE), and perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) obtained by the proposed method are better and the consensus rate is faster, which means that the proposed method performs better in audio quality and convergence rate, and therefore it is suitable for WASN with dynamic topology. wireless acoustic sensor networks (WASN) becoming more and more popular, WASNs are commonly used for monitoring bird audio long-term [2]. Automatic bird species identification provides a suitable way to analyze the huge audio data from long-term monitoring programs [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%