2016
DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2016.1208008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robots, Programming and Coding, Oh My!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Prominent researchers suggest these content areas should be integrated into elementary education (Bers, Ponte, Juelich, Viera, & Schenker, 2002; Bers, 2010; Devlin et al, 2013) and most states already have engineering standards (whether teachers know it or not) embedded into their curriculum (Carr et al, 2012; NGSS Lead States, 2013; Nickels, 2014). Robotics and programming/coding focus on all four areas of STEM, incorporating problem solving, critical thinking, sequencing, and design tasks through active learning and engagement (Geist, 2016; Sullivan & Heffernan, 2016). Currently, some structures and software are in place to help students of young ages access programming (e.g., WonderWorkshop Dash, Lego WeDo, Scratch, www.code.org).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prominent researchers suggest these content areas should be integrated into elementary education (Bers, Ponte, Juelich, Viera, & Schenker, 2002; Bers, 2010; Devlin et al, 2013) and most states already have engineering standards (whether teachers know it or not) embedded into their curriculum (Carr et al, 2012; NGSS Lead States, 2013; Nickels, 2014). Robotics and programming/coding focus on all four areas of STEM, incorporating problem solving, critical thinking, sequencing, and design tasks through active learning and engagement (Geist, 2016; Sullivan & Heffernan, 2016). Currently, some structures and software are in place to help students of young ages access programming (e.g., WonderWorkshop Dash, Lego WeDo, Scratch, www.code.org).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next step to introduce coding into elementary currciculum is allowing students access to physical robots, tangible code, and the overlap of STEM subjects (Geist, 2016) with adequate support for teachers and students with disabilities. Students as young as Pre-K can access robotics and programming technology (Bers, 2010), but the right systems (e.g., symbolic or picture code rather than text-based code) need to be created to meet their academic level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to basic knowledge and skills, having a high level of knowledge in technology is among the skills expected from individuals in the twenty-first century (Geist, 2016;National Education Association [NEA], 2012). Computational thinking skills, which are expressed as twenty-first-century skills, must be gained by integrating them into curriculums (Kong et al, 2020).…”
Section: Computational Thinking and Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its goal is to understand how to bring it into preschool practice. It considered three developmentally appropriate [18] approaches to computation: computational thinking, programming, and robotics. Within computational thinking, it distinguished between learning activities that incorporate non-programmable digital technologies (e.g., an interactive whiteboard, a digital camera, and a computer for non-programmable activities) and those that do not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%