2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01543-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
70
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The robotic system, particularly the da Vinci System approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for gynecologic surgery since 2005 is superior to laparatomy and provides a shorter hospital stay, less morbidity than laparatomy and easier recovery (Beste, 2005;Carlson, 1994;Chitwood, 2000;Degueldre, 2000;Diaz-Arrastia, 2002;Reich, 2011;Tang & Obermair, 2009). …”
Section: Robotic Hysterectomy How the Robotic System Work?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The robotic system, particularly the da Vinci System approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for gynecologic surgery since 2005 is superior to laparatomy and provides a shorter hospital stay, less morbidity than laparatomy and easier recovery (Beste, 2005;Carlson, 1994;Chitwood, 2000;Degueldre, 2000;Diaz-Arrastia, 2002;Reich, 2011;Tang & Obermair, 2009). …”
Section: Robotic Hysterectomy How the Robotic System Work?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motions of the surgeon are translated to the robotic arms by using the remote control unit, whereas the robotic arms hold interchangeable surgical instruments that can be moved in a specific manner. Although the robotic system has progressed from simple surgical tasks to more complicated surgery in the past decade, robotic surgery is still in stage of development (Cadiere, 2001;Degueldre, 2000;Diaz-Arrastia, 2002;Stovall & Mann, 2011).…”
Section: Hysterectomy 40mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costs were significantly higher in the robot group and return to normal activity was significantly shorter in the robot group. 87 The first reanastomosis with the da Vinci robotic system were published by Degueldre et al After a feasibility series of eight women, 88 they evaluated 28 women in 2001. The mean operating time for bilateral anastomosis was 122 minutes, and there were no complications.…”
Section: Tubal Reanastomosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…salpingectomía, reanastomosis de las trompas de Falopio, transposición de ovarios y linfadenectomía (48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54). En el campo de la uroginecología, de gran desarrollo en los últimos años, se dice que la incorporación de mallas totales y la cirugía asistida por robot, son las mayores innovaciones (55).…”
Section: Alto Costounclassified