Robotic radical hysterectomy

Fanning, James; Fenton, Bradford W.; Purohit, M.

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.002

Cited by 113 publications

(76 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Several studies have shown that second-look laparoscopy was considered a promising candidate to replace second-look laparotomy which has been considered as standard treatment (65)(66)(67). In most initial studies which were conducted involving a small number of patients, second look laparoscopy did not produce satisfactory results and inappropriate operative field was reported to reach up to 12% and resulted in a false negative rate between 29.1% and 55% (65,68,69). It has been shown that patients in complete remission after chemotherapy underwent laparotomy and histological examination right after suspicious lesions were detected by second-look laparoscopy.…”

Section: Laparoscopic Re-assesment and 2nd Look Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures for Patients with Advanced and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Farghaly¹

2012

Ovarian Cancer - Clinical and Therapeutic Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Laparoscopic Re-assesment and 2nd Look Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures for Patients with Advanced and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Farghaly¹

2012

Ovarian Cancer - Clinical and Therapeutic Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[11][12][13][14][15][16] Magrina et al 17 reported that robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgeries are preferable to laparotomy for patients requiring radical hysterectomy in terms of blood loss and length of hospital stay. Boggess et al 16 conducted a case-control study of robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with laparotomic approach, and this study showed that robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is superior to open radical hysterectomy with regard to blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, and lymph 10 Magrina et al 14 Boggess et al 16 Fanning et al 15 Estape et al 13 Persson et al 11 Lowe et al 12 Maggioni et al 18 Boggess et al 19 DeNardis et al 20 Seamon et al 24 Veljovich et al 25 Peiretti et al 22 Lowe et al As many researchers demonstrated the feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer, several authors showed that the robot assisted staging surgery in endometrial cancer is comparable to conventional laparoscopic and laparotomic approach in terms of surgical outcomes. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] In addition, length of hospital stay, blood loss and peri-operative complication rates are significantly lower in patients who received robotic surgery than those who underwent laparotomic staging surgery.…”

Section: Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery In Gynecologic Cancermentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent advances of robotic surgery and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology

Jung

Kim

2009

J Gynecol Oncol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two innovative approaches in minimally invasive surgery that have been introduced recently are the da Vinci robotic platform and single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS). Robotic surgery has many advantages such as 3-dimensional view, the wrist like motion of the robotic arm and ergonomically comfortable position for the surgeon. Numerous literatures have demonstrated the feasibility of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. However, further research should be performed to demonstrate the superiority of robotic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopy. Additionally, cost reduction of robotic surgery is needed to adopt robotic surgery into gynecologic oncology worldwide. SPLS has several possible benefits including reduced operative complications, reduced postoperative pain, and better cosmetic results compared to conventional laparoscopy. Although several authors have indicated that SPLS is a feasible approach for gynecologic surgery, there have been few reports demonstrating the potential advantages over conventional laparoscopy. Moreover, technical difficulties of SPLS still exist. Therefore, the advantages of a single port approach compared to conventional laparoscope should be evaluated with comparative study, and further technologic development for SPLS is also needed. These two progressive technologies take the lead in the development of MIS and further studies should be performed to evaluate the benefits of robot surgery and SPLS.

show abstract

“…21 Robotic surgery is also used in gynecological oncology which is due to a great progression of robotic technology. In 2005, the first feasibility studies in both Europe and the United States were published.…”

Section: Uses Of Robotic Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Robotic Gynecological Surgery: A Clinical Approach

Ali¹,

Abdelbadee²,

Shazly³

et al. 2013

WJOLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To provide a review in the available literature in robotic gynecological surgery, focusing on history of robotic surgery, basic setup, advantages and disadvantages of the robotic surgery, uses of surgical robots, the future of the robotic surgery and finally laparoendoscopic single site robotic surgery.Design: Literature survey. Conclusion:Although it is not evident that robotic surgery is superior to conventional laparoscopic surgery in surgical outcomes, many studies demonstrate the positive feasibility of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in many gynecological fields including cancer. Robotic surgery is considered as a solution for the technical problems of minimal invasive surgery. However, the economic feasibility of robotic surgery still remains as an obstacle which should be overcomed. It is expected with further development of robotic technology that the concept of high cost will be resolved.

show abstract

Robotic radical hysterectomy

Cited by 113 publications

References 12 publications

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures for Patients with Advanced and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures for Patients with Advanced and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Recent advances of robotic surgery and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology

Robotic Gynecological Surgery: A Clinical Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About