Introduction:
At present, the advantages of robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy over laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large adrenal tumors (≥ 5 cm) are still controversial. Our study aimed to clarify whether robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy has significant advantages.
Materials and methods
A total of 244 patients with adrenal tumors ≥ 5 cm who underwent minimally invasive surgery in our hospital from 2010 to 2021 were included in this study. There were 77 patients in the robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy group and 167 patients in the laparoscopic adrenalectomy group. After propensity score matching, each group included 77 patients.
Results
There were no significant differences between the groups, in postoperative morbidity (p = 0.125)、estimated blood loss (p = 0.678)、operative time (p = 0.451), and postoperative hospital stay ( p = 1.000). The rate of conversion to open surgery in the robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy group was significantly lower than that in the laparoscopic adrenalectomy group [0(0.0%) vs 6(7.8%), p = 0.031]. However, the total hospitalization cost in the robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy group was significantly higher than that in the laparoscopic adrenalectomy group [53452 (46717, 60499) vs 33196 (27317, 41521), p < 0.001].
Conclusions
Both robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy and laparoscopic adrenalectomy are safe and effective in the treatment of large adrenal tumors. If the risk of conversion to open surgery is high, robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy should be the first choice.