1984
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7136(84)90074-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robert Kowalski on logic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the frequency of flying birds overwhelms the expected danger of making wrong predictions about penguins, we assume that birds fly by default. 2 One might not think that the monotonic approaches (Green, 1969, Kowalski, 1979, Fikes and Nilsson, 1971 are subject to the same objections. But their approaches seem to be the biggest casualties, since not only do they attempt to provide a complete set of frame axioms, they do not admit the possibility that some of their inferences might be defeasible, as do the non-monotonic approaches.…”
Section: Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the frequency of flying birds overwhelms the expected danger of making wrong predictions about penguins, we assume that birds fly by default. 2 One might not think that the monotonic approaches (Green, 1969, Kowalski, 1979, Fikes and Nilsson, 1971 are subject to the same objections. But their approaches seem to be the biggest casualties, since not only do they attempt to provide a complete set of frame axioms, they do not admit the possibility that some of their inferences might be defeasible, as do the non-monotonic approaches.…”
Section: Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These range from excplicitly encoding frame axioms in first-order logic and using theorem proving in order to plan [Green, 1969, Kowalski, 1979, to embedding frame axioms procedurally, or within some aspect of the representation (Fikes and Nilsson, 1971, Hewitt, 1972, Pednault, 1985, to monotonic approaches that use either domain-dependent "explanation closure axioms" [Haas, 1987, Schubert, 1989, Weber, 1989, that attempt to enumerate the complete set of actions which can alter the truth value of a proposition, or equivalently that use complete sets of independence assertions [Hayes, 1971, Georgeff, 19871, to (most popularly), the definition, development, and use of non-monotonic logics [Reiter, 1980, McCarthy, 1977, Lifschitz, 1987, Haugh, 1987, Shoham, 1986, Kautz, 1986] that use unsound inferences to conclude that things do not change unless there is explicit knowledge to the contrary.…”
Section: The Frame Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A programação lógica surgiu como a aplicação da resolução SLD a uma área relacionada à Inteligência Artificial: o processamento de linguagem natural. Restrita sua abrangência às Cláusulas de Horn (que estavam sendo usadas para descrever a gramática do francês), o método SLD introduzido em [Kow74] é completo e constitui a única regra de inferência do sistema chamado na época de PROLOG (de PROgramation en LOGique, cf. [Col93,p.331]).…”
Section: [Dav83 P1]unclassified