2019 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icicis46948.2019.9014721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Road Surface Quality Detection using Smartphone Sensors: Egyptian Roads Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a growing trend of relying on collections of crowdsourced data in designing and implementing various concepts of smart transportation and smart city [ 42 ]. Data recorded with sensors of wearable devices, such as smartphones, can be used to categorize driving behavior [ 43 , 44 ], detect transportation hazards [ 45 ], and assess road surface characteristics [ 46 , 47 ]. Smartphone accelerometer, gyroscope, and GPS sensors allow for collecting huge yet typically imbalanced datasets that would be used to train machine learning classifiers for the smart technologies.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing trend of relying on collections of crowdsourced data in designing and implementing various concepts of smart transportation and smart city [ 42 ]. Data recorded with sensors of wearable devices, such as smartphones, can be used to categorize driving behavior [ 43 , 44 ], detect transportation hazards [ 45 ], and assess road surface characteristics [ 46 , 47 ]. Smartphone accelerometer, gyroscope, and GPS sensors allow for collecting huge yet typically imbalanced datasets that would be used to train machine learning classifiers for the smart technologies.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic labeling is crucial to generalize the adopted methodology when dealing with very large datasets since manual labeling is impractical in that case. Authors in [17] introduced a generic methodology for automatically labeling the collected dataset whether each window of sensor readings reflect a road anomaly or normal road. This methodology evaluated K-Means and density-based clustering (DBSCAN) [2] algorithms and found that DBSCAN achieves a better accuracy than K-Means with minimum accuracy of 96% when compared with the manually labeled datasets.…”
Section: E Classification Modulementioning
confidence: 99%