2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Road safety performance measures and AADT uncertainty from short-term counts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, based on the distribution of errors, 95% of these estimates would be within 17% of the true AADT at the corresponding site. These results corroborate earlier findings by Milligan et al ( 22 ), which estimated the MAPE to be 6.7% using a similar dataset, but show a higher precision than the 95% confidence limits presented by Krile and Schroeder ( 21 ), which were −22.47% to 25.09%. The errors identified here encapsulate each of the sources described in Figure 1 and represent the total expected error associated with using short duration count data to estimate AADT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, based on the distribution of errors, 95% of these estimates would be within 17% of the true AADT at the corresponding site. These results corroborate earlier findings by Milligan et al ( 22 ), which estimated the MAPE to be 6.7% using a similar dataset, but show a higher precision than the 95% confidence limits presented by Krile and Schroeder ( 21 ), which were −22.47% to 25.09%. The errors identified here encapsulate each of the sources described in Figure 1 and represent the total expected error associated with using short duration count data to estimate AADT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Gadda et al 17, Sharma et al (18), Schroeder (21), Milligan et al (22) factors applied) to 19.35%. They suggested that classifying the count sites into different categories based on the functional classification, lane count, and area types would help to reduce the AADT estimation error.…”
Section: Sharma and Allipuram (5) Krile Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that Milligan et al also provide a summary of the AADT estimation errors from several older studies from the literature (25). These studies either do not report the uncertainty range or do so for conditions that are not commonly encountered in practice (i.e., shortterm count duration of a month or greater).…”
Section: Aadt Obsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milligan et al characterized the accuracy of AADT estimated from short-term counts using data from 69 permanent count stations in Manitoba, Canada ( 25 ). They performed their study in a similar manner to the FHWA study but, instead of computing expansion factors from a factor group containing multiple permanent count stations, they computed the expansion factors from the single closest permanent count station belonging to the same traffic pattern group as the short-term count site (they term this the “IPC method”).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, obtaining a higher accuracy of annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume is a challenging task. However, due to the inevitable errors of statistical tools and methods, the use of AADT point values is unreliable [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. In addition, measurement uncertainty is considered to be widespread in the field of road engineering [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%