Road Pricing in Indonesia: How Will Public Respond?

Sunitiyoso, Yos; Nuraeni, Shimaditya; Inayati, Tutik; Hadiansyah, Fikri; Nurdayat, Ilham Fadhil; Pambudi, Noorhan Firdaus

doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.084

Cited by 9 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the present results were contradictory with the existing study results. It may be that more than 2 people in a household are not available in a developed country due to non-nuclear families or if the number of people earning in a household has to pay more for congestion pricing (Sunitiyoso et al, 2020). For vehicle ownership of two-wheelers, comparing the neutral with support condition, the odd ratio is decreased by 35% and 18% for one and two own two-wheelers and increased for two and above own twowheelers by 44%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study results observed that people having only one car are more likely to oppose congestion pricing, and people having less than two cars are more likely to remain neutral. However, the existing studies do not show any significant impact of car ownership on public acceptability of congestion pricing (Jaensirisak et al, 2005;Sunitiyoso et al, 2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From Table 4, it looks like the odds of reducing traffic congestion, improving air quality, and getting more people to use public transportation are 182%, 131%, and 54% higher, respectively, than if people were neutral about congestion pricing. Existing studies show that the perceived effectiveness will significantly exceed the acceptability of congestion pricing by commuters due to the significant benefits received by the congestion pricing strategies (Sunitiyoso et al, 2020). Researchers have identified that effective communication strategies about the outcomes of congestion pricing may boost the acceptance of congestion pricing by the public (Kim et al, 2013;Hensher and Li, 2013;Gu et al, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies have been conducted in developing countries to explore the perceived effectiveness and environmental aspects of congestion pricing (Liu et al, 2020). Also, studies have examined the public attitude towards socio-demographic factors, revenue allocation, and traffic management strategies in the acceptability of congestion pricing (Sunitiyoso et al, 2020). Studies have concluded that younger age groups of students and non-car-owning people highly accept the implementation of congestion pricing (Li et al, 2020).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Does the Public Accept Congestion Pricing System in India in Developing Countries Context

Shyamsunder¹,

Kadali²

2023

ToTS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traffic congestion is the major problem due to rapid urbanization and exponential growth of private vehicles, a decrease in the use of active transport, which results in problems of transport sustainability and public health issues. Generally, commuters often find it challenging to travel along the congested routes in urban areas due to increased travel time or air pollution. The traffic congestion of those congested routes may be minimized using strategies like congestion pricing, but public acceptability is one of the main hurdles in establishing a congestion pricing scheme. The present study attempted to understand the public acceptability of the congestion pricing system in India. To fulfil the objective of the study, a questionnaire survey was conducted to ascertain the public's perception of the congestion pricing system. In order to achieve this objective, a multinomial logistic regression (MNL) model was devel-oped by considering public opinion on support to implement congestion pricing as a dependent variable, and other variables were considered as independent variables. From the model results, it is understood that the travel frequency (viz., 1-2 and 3-4 times) and number of times struck in congestion of commuters are most likely to remain neutral. The revenue generated by congestion pricing is allocated to road infrastructure, car tax reductions, public transportation, and parking areas, which are more likely to remain in neutral and under review after implementation. The study results are more useful to policy makers in urban areas while they relook at congestion pricing strategies in developing countries.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Does the Public Accept Congestion Pricing System in India in Developing Countries Context

Shyamsunder¹,

Kadali²

2023

ToTS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ideally, these two TDM schemes can be applied together to obtain optimal traffic control within the city, but sometimes many factors can be constrained for such policies to be implemented together or individually. While many studies on ERP for Jakarta have been done [15,16,17,18], only a few have been done for parking pricing as a traffic restraint instrument [13,19]. However, on the other hand, applying P2 is considered by some to be the second-best alternative to RP [20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison Analysis on Car User Decision When Faced with Different Congestion Pricing Policy (Case Study: Jakarta Metropolitan Area)

Alvinsyah

Fathurrizqi

2022

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to analyze the car user’s decision in their mode choice when faced with two different congestion pricing, namely Road Pricing (RP) and Parking Pricing (P2) policy scheme. The comparison analysis is conducted through the developed binomial logit model both for RP and P2 policy schemes. Data is collected by utilizing a stated preference survey, where the car user is asked their preference towards the mode choice on a given set of price and timesaving combination for both policies. Then the utility function for each policy is established by conducting some statistical procedures to have a feasible and reasonable model. Having set the utility functions, the validity test is carried out to the developed model using a different set of data from the survey. Further analysis is done to select the model that satisfies the statistical feasibility and the validity threshold number. Comparison to both different choice models yields different decisions represented in the form of shifting mode percentages. The research results show that the RP policy scheme tends to shift the car user higher than the P2 policy scheme at the same total additional charging fare.

show abstract

Drivers’ willingness to shift towards electronic toll collection system in india

Bari

Dhamaniya

Chandra

2023

Case Studies on Transport Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Road Pricing in Indonesia: How Will Public Respond?

Cited by 9 publications

References 22 publications

Does the Public Accept Congestion Pricing System in India in Developing Countries Context

Does the Public Accept Congestion Pricing System in India in Developing Countries Context

A Comparison Analysis on Car User Decision When Faced with Different Congestion Pricing Policy (Case Study: Jakarta Metropolitan Area)

Drivers’ willingness to shift towards electronic toll collection system in india

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About