2001
DOI: 10.1177/030089160108700304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roach's Mathematical Equations in Predicting Pathological Stage in Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Abstract: The equations represent a practical and effective instrument for preoperative clinical staging in patients with localized prostate cancer. By means of these mathematical formulas, one can assess the correct prognosis and--above all--plan the best therapeutic approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, three updates of the Partin nomograms have been published (3)(4)(5), necessitated by significant stage migration (6). As more patients present with early stage disease, the prediction of lymph node involvement requires a tool with more precision within this group.…”
Section: In Response To Dr Hayes and Colleaguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since then, three updates of the Partin nomograms have been published (3)(4)(5), necessitated by significant stage migration (6). As more patients present with early stage disease, the prediction of lymph node involvement requires a tool with more precision within this group.…”
Section: In Response To Dr Hayes and Colleaguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As more patients present with early stage disease, the prediction of lymph node involvement requires a tool with more precision within this group. Therefore, although Hayes et al express concern that we exclude cT3 disease and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values .26, they highlight an important point: in the era of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413 and the RF, these findings were more commonplace (5-6% of patients) (3,6), whereas in the contemporary era, these findings are so rare that the most recent version of the Partin tables excludes these patients (3). Our approach is therefore consistent with that employed in these revised Partin tables.…”
Section: In Response To Dr Hayes and Colleaguesmentioning
confidence: 99%