ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Sketches on - SIGGRAPH '04 2004
DOI: 10.1145/1186223.1186394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RLE sparse level sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Color and normal info ( b ) ehicle moves forward, the uncertainty increases thus the distance field is control input to determine how each grid point is changing relative to th xt grid location you can see the map has deformed to accommodate the u face), blue represents the interior of the object (negative distance) green ent the laser line scan data. The red dots represent the locations in whic represents the current location of the sensor for this set of measurement d, they are constant for a p. This can be alleviated e field appropriately with n [16] which used a o represent the level-set le high amounts of detail ents. Similarly, adaptive ees [24], or simply using [21] reduces the memory ing the computational since we must solve an e grid for each prediction tage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Color and normal info ( b ) ehicle moves forward, the uncertainty increases thus the distance field is control input to determine how each grid point is changing relative to th xt grid location you can see the map has deformed to accommodate the u face), blue represents the interior of the object (negative distance) green ent the laser line scan data. The red dots represent the locations in whic represents the current location of the sensor for this set of measurement d, they are constant for a p. This can be alleviated e field appropriately with n [16] which used a o represent the level-set le high amounts of detail ents. Similarly, adaptive ees [24], or simply using [21] reduces the memory ing the computational since we must solve an e grid for each prediction tage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the only work directly related to ours is the work by Bridson [4] and Houston et al [14]. Bridson [4] suggests to store the level set in a sparse block grid which is a coarse uniform grid with finer uniform grids nested in the coarse grid cells that intersect the interface.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bridson also suggests a solution based on a hashtable to allow the grid to expand, but does not demonstrate it. The method of Houston et al [14] was described in a technical sketch (one page abstract) recently presented at a graphics conference, where we concurrently summarized the main features of DTGrid [3]. Their work primarily focuses on fluid simulations, and they propose a data structure based on Run-Length-Encoding which decouples the storage of the elements from the actual encoding.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for the eikonal equation used to maintain the signed distance property of the level set function, [19] used some special treatment at T-junctions in the context of the fast marching spirit [37]. There have been other local level set methods [20], [35], [5], [14], [4] proposed which range from variants of AMR to using tubes of uniformly spaced grid points near the interface. Some of the methods approach the complexity of [26], eliminating the need to store the unused grid points away from the interface of interest.…”
Section: Performing Organization Report Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%