2019
DOI: 10.1089/vio.2017.0073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risky Social Media Behaviors and the Potential for Victimization: A Descriptive Look at College Students Victimized by Someone Met Online

Abstract: This work uses original survey research to explore the nature of risky behaviors and exposure to potential offenders using social media as a means to initiate personal relationships. During fall 2016, instructors at a large university were recruited to conduct paper and pencil classroom surveys, resulting in a sample of 1310 undergraduate students. Their results first suggest that nearly all sampled students use social media and that half of college students use social media to meet new people. Alarmingly, *1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dating apps offers access to more likely dates and sexual encounters, allows online communication with potential partners, helps to acquire information about people before meeting them in person, and offers diverse tools to negotiate stages of their love/sex relationships [2,3]. Nevertheless, dating apps also have disadvantages like the gamification of relationships, engaging in risky behaviors (e.g., unprotected sex, disclosing personal information, stalking and cyberstalking, sexual victimization) and being exposed to behaviors like "breadcrumbing", "slow fading", "benching", "haunting", or "ghosting" [4,5]. These behaviors are examples of how people use Internet-mediated communication and dating apps to flirt, initiate, maintain, or end relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dating apps offers access to more likely dates and sexual encounters, allows online communication with potential partners, helps to acquire information about people before meeting them in person, and offers diverse tools to negotiate stages of their love/sex relationships [2,3]. Nevertheless, dating apps also have disadvantages like the gamification of relationships, engaging in risky behaviors (e.g., unprotected sex, disclosing personal information, stalking and cyberstalking, sexual victimization) and being exposed to behaviors like "breadcrumbing", "slow fading", "benching", "haunting", or "ghosting" [4,5]. These behaviors are examples of how people use Internet-mediated communication and dating apps to flirt, initiate, maintain, or end relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluke psychology fostered by Internet technology ( Fansher and Randa, 2019 ). Most criminals will be punished for their illegal acts.…”
Section: Psychoanalysis Of College Students’ Entrepreneurship and Pre...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the freedom offered by these applications in terms of one’s online self-presentation (e.g., images and location; Sumter et al, 2017; see also Lauckner et al, 2019; Miles, 2019). Relatedly, Fansher and Randa (2019) found that it is also common that users share their personal information with strangers in a short time through these applications. While such disclosure of personal information on social media in general has been found to increase the risk of cybervictimization (e.g., Reyns et al, 2011; Welsh & Lavoie, 2012), limited research has examined how LBRTDAs specifically may facilitate cybervictimization or how application infrastructure and profile features influence that risk (Phan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%