2018
DOI: 10.1002/2018ef000813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks from Climate Extremes Change Differently from 1.5°C to 2.0°C Depending on Rarity

Abstract: Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change have agreed to hold the “increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C above preindustrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C.” Comparison of the costs and benefits for different warming limits requires an understanding of how risks vary between warming limits. As changes in risk are often associated with changes in exposure due to projected changes in local or regional climate extremes, we anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
104
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
18
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best‐estimate RRs for the 20‐year precipitation extremes in CanESM2 (Figure S3) show similar patterns to the results from the 50‐year events, though the magnitudes are smaller. This result is consistent with previous studies that found increases in the probability of extremes increase with the rarity of the event (Fischer & Knutti, ; Kharin et al., ). On the other hand, the lower‐bound RRs for 20‐year precipitation events are larger and more cohesive than those for 50‐year events, particularly for the one grid scale.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best‐estimate RRs for the 20‐year precipitation extremes in CanESM2 (Figure S3) show similar patterns to the results from the 50‐year events, though the magnitudes are smaller. This result is consistent with previous studies that found increases in the probability of extremes increase with the rarity of the event (Fischer & Knutti, ; Kharin et al., ). On the other hand, the lower‐bound RRs for 20‐year precipitation events are larger and more cohesive than those for 50‐year events, particularly for the one grid scale.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Keeping in mind the differences in methods and event definitions, the patterns of RR presented here are broadly consistent with those in Kharin et al. () and Fischer and Knutti (). These results are also qualitatively consistent with conclusions of the IPCC SR15 report, which showed statistically detectable changes in heavy precipitation for large subcontinental regions for differences in global warming of only +0.5 °C, but overall no corresponding grid‐scale signals because of too small signal‐to‐noise ratios (Hoegh‐Guldberg et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Results globally confirmed the theoretical arguments pointing at the intensification of extreme precipitation over the study domain, with relatively stronger trends for short‐duration AM and more extreme events. This conclusion is consistent with previous analyses over North America (e.g., Kharin et al., ; Mailhot et al., ) and was highlighted by results on AM empirical quantile, as well as from the analysis of their spatiotemporal scaling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For example, a generalized extreme value distribution is routinely used to fit extreme values such as annual maximum daily temperatures (Kharin et al, 2013(Kharin et al, , 2018. A probability distribution is often used to fit the data if a particular form of the distribution can be assumed.…”
Section: Risk Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%