2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02735
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks for Child Cognitive Development in Rural Contexts

Abstract: While poverty all over the world is more typical and extreme in rural contexts, interventions to improve cognition in low socioeconomic status (SES) children are for the most part based on studies conducted in urban populations. This paper investigate how poverty and rural or urban settings affect child cognitive performance. Executive functions and non-verbal intelligence performance, as well as individual and environmental information was obtained from 131 5-year-old children. For the same level of SES, chil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
25
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, geometry has received less frequent attention for rural and urban pre-k populations. Likewise, EF seems less consistently studied across the urban-rural context, but it appears the same differences exist for EF with urban 9 children scoring higher than their rural peers (Hermida, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Context and Time Within The Ppct Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, geometry has received less frequent attention for rural and urban pre-k populations. Likewise, EF seems less consistently studied across the urban-rural context, but it appears the same differences exist for EF with urban 9 children scoring higher than their rural peers (Hermida, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Context and Time Within The Ppct Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding has particular importance for state or regional-level directors responsible for child programs across a variety of contexts. Urban children tend to outscore their suburban and rural peers on kindergarten mathematics (Hermida, et al, 2019), and this advantage persists and broadens over the school years (Graham & Provost, 2012). When urbanicity is divided into large urban, small urban, and rural designations, kindergarten children in small urban areas outscore large urban and rural children on mathematics .…”
Section: Context and Time Within The Ppct Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding individual variables, we expected to replicate the results of previous studies. Past preschool attendance has been linked with cognition in rural contexts (Hermida et al, 2018), so we expected to replicate this finding. However, because the quality of rural education is generally low (Vernon-Feagans et al, 2013), the effects of preschool education on cognition could be lower.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Rural contexts have been also characterized by low‐quality dwellings and low parental occupation (Chambers, ), factors that has been shown to affect normal cognitive development (Ngure et al, ). As a consequence, poor rural environments provide a more taxing scenario for typical cognitive development, than urban contexts with comparable overall levels of poverty (Hermida et al, ). Although this evidence presents rural contexts as ones with particular risk, there is a wide range of variability in their effects on cognition, because cognitive development depends not only on environmental factors but also on individual variables (Bronfenbrenner, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4]. Poverty can have a negative impact on cognitive development, but most of the studies have been carried out in urban populations [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%