2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13313-010-0025-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks and benefits of soil amendment with composts in relation to plant pathogens

Abstract: The supply of composts has increased in many countries due to the enforced diversion from landfill of organic biodegradable wastes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…can be suppressed by adding compost to potting media (Ben-Yephet and Nelson 1999;Hoitink and Boehm 1999;Stone et al 2004;Noble and Coventry 2005), but this practice is probably successful because extremely high levels of microbial activity can be achieved in such systems. Suppressive effects tend to be smaller and more variable in the field (Stone et al 2001;Noble and Coventry 2005;Noble 2011) and we concur with that view. Our results suggest that management practices which conserve or enhance the organic matter content of soil will enhance suppressiveness but are unlikely to generate enough biological activity to markedly reduce rhizome rot under conditions that favour the pathogen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…can be suppressed by adding compost to potting media (Ben-Yephet and Nelson 1999;Hoitink and Boehm 1999;Stone et al 2004;Noble and Coventry 2005), but this practice is probably successful because extremely high levels of microbial activity can be achieved in such systems. Suppressive effects tend to be smaller and more variable in the field (Stone et al 2001;Noble and Coventry 2005;Noble 2011) and we concur with that view. Our results suggest that management practices which conserve or enhance the organic matter content of soil will enhance suppressiveness but are unlikely to generate enough biological activity to markedly reduce rhizome rot under conditions that favour the pathogen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For untreated plot, clubroot scale value was 5.9 (value ranging from 1-9) whereas it was 5.2 for composted plot. The present findings of highest Disease control for the treatment comprising compost was supported by (Noble, 2011) who found out in an experiment using 79 containers that when the soil was amended with at least 20% v/v compost, 59 containers showed suppressive effect against soil borne pathogens and only 6 showed disease promoting effect of compost amendment. However sufficient literatures on the use of vermicompost (as a specific form of compost) against clubroot disease were not found.…”
Section: Effect On Disease Severity Index (Dsi) and Disease Control Psupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Sclerotium rolfsii is a facultative parasitic fungus that grows and survives saprophytes in the soil. According to Noble (2011) and Zachow et al (2011), this fungus attack is more severe in sandy soils because the S. rolfsii fungus requires aerobic oxygen (O2), and in soil conditions with low nitrogen content and high temperatures. Therefore, another alternative is needed to control the stem rot disease such as using fungicides (Bhuiyan et al, 2012;El-Mohamedy et al, 2014), organic amendments (Hadar, 2011;Lahre et al, 2012;Paramasivan et al, 2013), soil solarization (Raj and Sharma, 2009;Lee et al, 2016), botanical pesticides (Amin et al, 29013), rhizobacteria (Hapsah, 2019), and bio-agents (Rakh et al, 2011;Lahre et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%