2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03545.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks and benefits of invasive epilepsy surgery workup with implanted subdural and depth electrodes

Abstract: SUMMARYPurpose: In patients with pharmacoresistant focal-onset seizures, invasive presurgical workup can identify epilepsy surgery options when noninvasive workup has failed. Yet, the potential benefit must be balanced with procedure-related risks. This study examines risks associated with the implantation of subdural strip and grid, and intracerebral depth electrodes. Benefit of invasive monitoring is measured by seizure outcomes. Diagnostic procedures made possible by electrode implantation are described. Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
103
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
103
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation for rising complication rates could be the increasing use of larger or bilateral arrays and grids, which are associated with higher complication rates, compared with depth electrodes. 31,84 Another possible explanation could be an increasing sensitivity to complications and more careful documentation over time. However, it is also possible that surgeons are now performing fewer intracranial recordings, resulting in decreased surgical familiarity and increased complication potential.…”
Section: Electrode Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for rising complication rates could be the increasing use of larger or bilateral arrays and grids, which are associated with higher complication rates, compared with depth electrodes. 31,84 Another possible explanation could be an increasing sensitivity to complications and more careful documentation over time. However, it is also possible that surgeons are now performing fewer intracranial recordings, resulting in decreased surgical familiarity and increased complication potential.…”
Section: Electrode Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar complication rates have been previously described in surgical series involving children who underwent staged epilepsy surgery. 24,38 Although staged resections necessitate more immediate discomfort, expense, and risk, the results in our series suggest that the likelihood of longerterm seizure control and low morbidity may justify this approach, particularly in light of the known association of porencephalic cysts and stroke-related foci to distant epileptogenic zones, and dual and sometimes triple pathologies giving rise to medically intractable seizures. 22 The temporary deficits incurred in our series, particularly in the setting of multilobar disconnections and hemispherotomies, are well-recognized side effects of major epilepsy operations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Epilepsy surgery is an effective and safe alternative form of therapy for those patients with focal onset epilepsy [32,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Major complications from epilepsy surgery and subdural electrode evaluation have an incidence of less than 7% and long term permanent deficits have an incidence of less than 2% [52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. An epilepsy surgery evaluation typically starts with long term video-EEG monitoring to confirm the diagnosis and type of focal onset epilepsy, establish the seizure type and seizure onset zone and determine the disabling effects of ictal behavior [42,59].…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%