2010
DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2010.10676338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks affecting breeding objectives for radiata pine in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, avoid establishing P. radiata on sites known to have poor water holding capacity or low site quality (e.g. having a stand MTH at age 10 < 14 m), alternatively plant drought-tolerant genotypes on these sites (Ivković et al, 2010). Most importantly, maintain the recommended thinning schedule, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Secondly, avoid establishing P. radiata on sites known to have poor water holding capacity or low site quality (e.g. having a stand MTH at age 10 < 14 m), alternatively plant drought-tolerant genotypes on these sites (Ivković et al, 2010). Most importantly, maintain the recommended thinning schedule, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of this empirical study, and if compartments in southern NSW continue to be planted to 1000 stems per ha, we provide the follow recommendations aimed at preventing the risk of P. radiata plantations suffering drought-induced mortality under climate conditions predicted for the next 30-70 years (CSIRO and Australian Bureau of Meteorology, 2007;Battaglia et al, 2009). Firstly avoid establishing plantations on sites having a mean elevation below 600 m or establish these sites with drought-tolerant genotypes (Ivković et al, 2010). Secondly, avoid establishing P. radiata on sites known to have poor water holding capacity or low site quality (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation