2014
DOI: 10.1177/0194599814542588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Malignancy Associated with Head and Neck CT in Children: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Objective To perform a systematic review to evaluate the risk of malignancy associated with computed tomography (CT) of the head and/or neck in infants, children, and adolescents. Data Sources Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were assessed from the date of their inception to January 2014. Additionally, manual searches of bibliographies were performed and topic experts were contacted. Review Methods Data were obtained from studies measuring or estimating the risks of malignancy associated with radia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,9,16 Concern regarding the safety of radiation exposure in children has caused a shift away from studies involving the use of ionizing radiation, such as angiography and CT. 7,22 Recent estimates have placed the mean radiation dose to the skin from a single diagnostic angiogram in a child under the age of 21 at 239.4 mGy, while the dose absorbed by the brain is lower. Infants experience a slightly higher dose due to skull thickness, but the total is still less than 1 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,9,16 Concern regarding the safety of radiation exposure in children has caused a shift away from studies involving the use of ionizing radiation, such as angiography and CT. 7,22 Recent estimates have placed the mean radiation dose to the skin from a single diagnostic angiogram in a child under the age of 21 at 239.4 mGy, while the dose absorbed by the brain is lower. Infants experience a slightly higher dose due to skull thickness, but the total is still less than 1 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate follow-up modality and timing are therefore subjects of debate, particularly in light of concerns regarding radiation exposure and general anesthesia in children. 7,22,30 We present our experience with surveillance for AVM recurrence, associated risk factors, and clinical outcome, while considering the implications of these findings for follow-up protocols after treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on the estimated rate of excess long-term cancer risk is still being reported and compiled 28. Current estimates are based on large population-based retrospective studies using registry data 8 17 18.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…89 The most rigorous data from that sister study show that if every excess brain cancer after brain CT were attributable only to the imaging itself, then approximately 1 in 4000 pediatric brain CTs would be followed by a malignancy (mean estimated radiation dose 40 mSv per scan) or 1 brain tumor per 10,000 patients (10 mGy per scan, < 10 years of age at exposure). 90,91 As temporal bone CT confers a smaller radiation dose than brain CT, the associated risks of radiation are anticipated to be even lower, although direct patient data from temporal bone imaging are very limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%