2014
DOI: 10.1177/0194599814545727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Yield of Computed Tomography Scan for Pediatric Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Background Computed tomography (CT) has been used in the assessment of pediatric hearing loss, but concern regarding radiation risk and increased utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have prompted us toward a more quantitative and sophisticated understanding of CT’s potential diagnostic yield. Objective To perform a systematic review to analyze the diagnostic yield of CT for pediatric hearing loss, including subgroup evaluation according to impairment severity and laterality, as well as the specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(268 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systematic reviews concluded that the diagnostic yield of imaging studies is approximately 30% for CT and 26% for MRI, respectively. 40,41 Imaging studies provide important information about anatomic variation in patients and can guide surgical planning for cochlear implantation; however, decision regarding timing of imaging must take into account risks attributable to either radiation exposure or sedation. If no significant management alterations would derive from imaging findings, one may consider deferring imaging until the child is old enough to undergo MRI without sedation, unless a non-sedated MRI protocol is available.…”
Section: Basic Algorithm For Evaluation Of Congenital Sensorineuramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic reviews concluded that the diagnostic yield of imaging studies is approximately 30% for CT and 26% for MRI, respectively. 40,41 Imaging studies provide important information about anatomic variation in patients and can guide surgical planning for cochlear implantation; however, decision regarding timing of imaging must take into account risks attributable to either radiation exposure or sedation. If no significant management alterations would derive from imaging findings, one may consider deferring imaging until the child is old enough to undergo MRI without sedation, unless a non-sedated MRI protocol is available.…”
Section: Basic Algorithm For Evaluation Of Congenital Sensorineuramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review of 50 studies demonstrated that the diagnostic yield for temporal bone CT scans ranges from 7 to 74 % with a pooled diagnostic yield of 30 % and so; on average, four patients need to undergo a CT scan to yield one relevant diagnostic result [24]. Lin et al found that anomalies in the temporal bone were found in 18 % of children with severe to profound SNHL and the most commonly found anomalies were cochlear dysplasia (10.2 %), semicircular canal/vestibular dysplasia (10.2 %), IAC/CA anomalies (7.3 %), and enlarged vestibular aqueducts (5.3 %) [25].…”
Section: Medical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT will identify anatomic abnormalities in ∼ 30% of cases of pediatric SNHL [25] , including middle and inner ear dysplasias such as Mondini dysplasia. Intracranial calcifications suggest human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) or toxoplasmosis infections.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT provides superior definition of the bony middle and inner ear structures, including the ossicles, cochlea and semicircular canals, but carries the risk of radiation to a young child [25] . In addition, a normal bony internal auditory canal on CT does not rule out an absent or small auditory nerve.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%