Risk management and bank performance: evidence from the MENA region

Abstract

Purpose The credit crunch of 2008 and recent COVID-19 influences underscored the importance of liquidity and credit risk management in businesses and financial institutions. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of liquidity risk and credit risk management on accounting and market performances of banks operating in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a panel data regression analysis on a sample of 51 listed commercial banks operating in 10 MENA countries during the period 2010–2018. Findings The results show that credit risk management does not affect the accounting performance of banks, while it has a non-linear, convex relationship with market performance. Surprisingly, liquidity risk management is not a significant driver for either performance measure in studied banks. However, when a bank combines credit risk management with liquidity risk management efforts, liquidity risk management actions return significant results on both performances, illustrated by an inverted U-shaped relationship. In addition, this study examines the joint impact of both risks on bank performance. This study reveals that accounting and market performances are differently affected by joint risk management efforts. Their impact depends on the combination of risk management ratios upon which banks choose to focus their efforts. Practical implications The findings help bankers and regulators further consider non-linearities and offer them new tools for managing the impact of credit and liquidity risk interactions towards achieving more financial stability. Originality/value These results contribute to traditional banking in offering bankers and regulators new tools for managing the impact of credit and liquidity risk interactions on bank performance.

Credit risk management in small-scale farming by formal financial institutions during the COVID-19 era: Nigerian perspective

“…They argue that increasing the lending rate will facilitate higher return to asset as the financial institutions will earn higher income from credit. Though this variable was significant in the two regimes, the magnitude was higher before the pandemic than during the pandemic, as reported by Harb et al. (2022).…”

“…However, the bank characteristics, such as making agricultural economists or expert loan desk officers for agricultural loans, are statistically significant before the pandemic. However, this result is anticipated in the two regimes (Harb et al ., 2022); the variable was only significant before the pandemic. This is not supported in all literature available to the authors.…”

Bank Age and Financial Performance: Is the Relationship Linear or Nonlinear? Evidence From Listed and Unlisted Commercial Banks in China

“…For example, while Xiazi and Shabir (2022) reported that the relationship between bank size and financial performance was positive for bank samples covering 85 countries, Aydemir and Guloglu (2017) provided evidence that this relationship was negative for Turkish banks. Apart from these findings, Isik (2017b) and Harb et al (2022) reported that size-performance association follows the inverted U-shaped pattern for Turkish and MENA banks.…”

Ideal Self-Congruence: Neobanking by Traditional Banks and the Impact on Market Share - A Case of Uae Banks

“…Arif and Rehmawati (2018) confirmed that Islamic banks' market share is affected by its default rate measured by NPL. Al Zaidanin and Al Zaidanin, (2021) have reported a negative effect of NPL on bank profitability whereas a study by Harb et al, (2022) found that accounting performance of banks is not effected by credit risk but it has a non-linear relationship with market performance.…”