2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection in patients after tracheal intubation under general anesthesia in the Chinese health care system: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two reviewers assessed each study independently according to the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS) (Wells et al, ) addressing: (1) selection (4‐point score): to determine whether definition was adequate, cases representative, selection of controls, and definition of controls; (2) comparability (2 scores): to determine comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis; and (3) exposure (3 scores): to determine ascertainment of exposure, same method of ascertainment for cases and controls as well as non‐response rate (outcome for cohort studies). The NOS scale for quality evaluation has a maximum score of 9; scores 6 are considered indicative of high quality research, whilst scores <6 indicate low quality research (Xu et al, ). Two reviewers discussed the quality of every study according to the above quality evaluation criteria and reached consensus for the final decision.…”
Section: Review Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two reviewers assessed each study independently according to the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS) (Wells et al, ) addressing: (1) selection (4‐point score): to determine whether definition was adequate, cases representative, selection of controls, and definition of controls; (2) comparability (2 scores): to determine comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis; and (3) exposure (3 scores): to determine ascertainment of exposure, same method of ascertainment for cases and controls as well as non‐response rate (outcome for cohort studies). The NOS scale for quality evaluation has a maximum score of 9; scores 6 are considered indicative of high quality research, whilst scores <6 indicate low quality research (Xu et al, ). Two reviewers discussed the quality of every study according to the above quality evaluation criteria and reached consensus for the final decision.…”
Section: Review Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The airway management may influence the incidence of respiratory complications. [ 9 ] Compared to endotracheal intubation, the rate of pharyngalgia is significantly decreased, while the lung compliance is slightly enhanced following laryngeal mask airway. [ 10 ]…”
Section: Orbidity a Ssociated With mentioning
confidence: 99%