2014
DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for polyuria in a cross‐section of community psychiatric lithium‐treated patients

Abstract: Female gender and increased body weight explain part of the variance of this adverse effect. Both risk factors offer fresh insights into the pathophysiology of this potentially reversible and dangerous adverse effect of lithium treatment. Future research should focus on understanding the differences between the genders and between different body compositions in terms of lithium pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(90 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we found a significant relationship between urine output and lithium daily dose, independently of other factors including lithium treatment duration, as described by Kinahan et al (32). As expected, maximal urine osmolality was also a major determinant of urine output, which might be at least partly related to lithium treatment duration, explaining the absence of association between treatment duration and urinary output in the multivariable analysis (19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Nevertheless, we found a significant relationship between urine output and lithium daily dose, independently of other factors including lithium treatment duration, as described by Kinahan et al (32). As expected, maximal urine osmolality was also a major determinant of urine output, which might be at least partly related to lithium treatment duration, explaining the absence of association between treatment duration and urinary output in the multivariable analysis (19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Nevertheless, we found a significant relationship between urine output and lithium daily dose, independently of other factors including lithium treatment duration, as described by Kinahan et al 33 As expected, MaxUosm was also a major determinant of urine output, which might be at least partly related to lithium treatment duration, explaining the absence of association between treatment duration and urinary output in the multivariable analysis. 20 Daily osmolar intake, estimated by the 24-hour urine osmolality, was also a determinant of urine output, suggesting lowering salt and protein intake in individuals with lithium-induced NDI may be advised to lower urine output in clinical practice.…”
Section: Clinical Researchsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…< 700 mOsm/kg) under similar 8–10-h water restriction periods, has been termed as “partial NDI” [ 25 ]. The overnight water restriction urine osmolality has relatively high sensitivity/specificity for NDI compared to the gold-stander 24-h urine collection, particularly in combination with self-reported fluid intake, which we are also measuring [ 31 ]. In addition, we plan to complete a sub-group analysis of patients with a urine osmolality < 300 mOsm/Kg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This short-period water restriction was selected given that longer periods of water restriction are often poorly tolerated by patients, especially those on lithium treatment [ 30 ]. Clinically, the 10-h water restriction assessment of urine osmolality is often used and is highly specific and sensitive for NDI [ 25 , 31 , 32 ]. We will assess the raw urine osmolality value at 12-weeks, adjusted for baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation