2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07675-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for local tumor progression after RFA of pulmonary metastases: a matched case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, IAH was associated with a higher risk of local recurrence, which reached significance in the univariate analysis, likely because of the increasing difficulties in locating the target nodule in the background of the dense and radiopaque zone. In addition, the heat sink effect was associated with a higher risk of incomplete ablation for tumors with blood vessel contact resulting from the blood flow and microscopic extension ( 12 , 70 , 71 ). However, our variables relating to vessels did not reach significance, probably with the influence caused by the enrolled cases close to the mediastinum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, IAH was associated with a higher risk of local recurrence, which reached significance in the univariate analysis, likely because of the increasing difficulties in locating the target nodule in the background of the dense and radiopaque zone. In addition, the heat sink effect was associated with a higher risk of incomplete ablation for tumors with blood vessel contact resulting from the blood flow and microscopic extension ( 12 , 70 , 71 ). However, our variables relating to vessels did not reach significance, probably with the influence caused by the enrolled cases close to the mediastinum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ablative margin is also key to improving complete ablation and reducing postprocedural progression. When the ablative margin beyond the tumor was ≥5 mm (ideally 10 mm), complete ablation was significantly higher than that of a tumor with an ablative margin of <5 mm; local progression was also significantly lower than that of a tumor with an ablative margin of <5 mm 27 . However, excessive ablation may occur if the ablative margin is emphasized too much.…”
Section: Limitations and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When the ablative margin beyond the tumor was ≥5 mm (ideally 10 mm), complete ablation was significantly higher than that of a tumor with an ablative margin of <5 mm; local progression was also significantly lower than that of a tumor with an ablative margin of <5 mm. 27 However, excessive ablation may occur if the ablative margin is emphasized too much. An ablative margin beyond the tumor of >10 mm can aggravate lung parenchymal injury and cause more complications.…”
Section: Limitations and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors also favored TA over stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for 2-3 cm oligometastatic lesions in these high-risk patients, notably due to its better safety profile for pulmonary function [30]. However, TA has its own complications and limitations, in particular regarding tumor size and location [31], underlining the need for careful patient selection.…”
Section: Indications Of Thermal Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local tumor control has also been shown to be associated with the absence of contact with a large vessel or a large bronchus [85,86] and complete coverage of tumor by the ablation zone with a margin of 5-10 mm [87,88]. In a matched case-control study [31], 48 patients with first local tumor progression after RFA were matched to a control group of 112 patients to control for nodule size (±5 mm tolerance), nodule number (≤2 vs. ≥3), and primary histological type (categories: colon, rectum, other). In the multiple regression model, only an ablation margin ≤5 mm remained a risk factor of local tumor progression.…”
Section: Local Efficacy and Predictors Of Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%