2016
DOI: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20161604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for adverse outcome in asphyxiated new born in Eastern Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Average duration of hospital stay of non-survivors was 4.35±2.98 days compared to 9.07±4.85 days in surviving neonates (p<0.0001). Similarly, a shorter duration of hospital stay was observed by various researchers 14,18 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Average duration of hospital stay of non-survivors was 4.35±2.98 days compared to 9.07±4.85 days in surviving neonates (p<0.0001). Similarly, a shorter duration of hospital stay was observed by various researchers 14,18 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Although birth asphyxia-related NM is a significant public health concern worldwide, developing nations, including Ethiopia, are the most affected. As per previous studies, the death rate among asphyxiated newborns ranged from 13.3% to 40.3% [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Different maternal and neonatal sociodemographic features, such as obstetric and health-care-related variables (home delivery, lack of ante natal follow up, spontaneous virginal delivery, premature neonates, shock during admission, severe asphyxia) were associated with mortality of asphyxiated neonates [14,15,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…From the rest 94 articles, 48 were excluded as a result of not fulfilling our inclusion criteria by reviewing their titles and abstracts. Therefore, 46 full-text articles were accessed and assessed for eligibility based on the inclusion criteria [3,15,17,20,21,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71]. Finally, 13 studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis (Figure 1).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Reviewed Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%