2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors and outcome of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reports from the United Kingdom reported a high level of (40%) fecal carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli strains in nursing home residents (31). A recent multicenter study on ESBL-producing Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream infection in the United States also revealed that as many as 56.3% of patients with ESBL-producing E. cloacae were admitted from a nursing home and that ESBL production is one of the independent risk factors for ESBL production in their cohort (32). This study identified unique epidemiologic characteristics of patients harboring CTX-M E. coli compared to patients with non-CTX-M E. coli, including male gender, impaired consciousness, prior use of H2 blockers, immunosuppressive status, and exposure to penicillins and/or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports from the United Kingdom reported a high level of (40%) fecal carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli strains in nursing home residents (31). A recent multicenter study on ESBL-producing Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream infection in the United States also revealed that as many as 56.3% of patients with ESBL-producing E. cloacae were admitted from a nursing home and that ESBL production is one of the independent risk factors for ESBL production in their cohort (32). This study identified unique epidemiologic characteristics of patients harboring CTX-M E. coli compared to patients with non-CTX-M E. coli, including male gender, impaired consciousness, prior use of H2 blockers, immunosuppressive status, and exposure to penicillins and/or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study (28), nine patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream infections were treated with cefepime, and it was found that four (66.7%) of six patients who were treated with cefepime and whose isolates had cefepime MICs of 0.25 to 3 g/ml showed clinical failure. Further well-designed prospective clinical studies are needed to determine the efficacy of ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam in the treatment of in- …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we had used the clinical breakpoints furnished by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST; http://www.eucast.org), all of the strains would have be categorized as nonsusceptible to both cefepime and ceftazidime, and therapy with these drugs would have been classified as inadequate. Some investigators (49) have questioned the true efficacy of ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam against ESBL-producing strains of Enterobacteriaceae strains that appear to be susceptible to these drugs on the basis of CLSI breakpoints, and others have reported poor outcomes when severe infections caused by ESBL producers are treated with oxyimino-cephalosporins, even when the MICs fall within the susceptible range (32,35). As Wang et al (49) have pointed out, larger multicenter studies (including tertiary as well as primary care centers and LTCFs) are needed to better define the efficacy of these antibiotics and optimal MIC cutoff points for their use in the treatment of severe infections caused by apparently susceptible ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains.…”
Section: Fig 2 Hospital Length Of Stay (Los) Following Bsi Onset In Smentioning
confidence: 99%