Computational Intelligent Systems for Applied Research 2002
DOI: 10.1142/9789812777102_0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RISK FACTOR ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF NATURAL DISASTERS: APPLICATION OF THE RIFAE FRAMEWORK TO THE 2000 TOKAIFLOOD DISASTER IN JAPAN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A survey of risks associated with damage after a major flood event in Japan in 2000 found that major property risk factors included household characteristics such as the type of dwelling, ownership, and inundation extents. ( 20 ) A second study of this flood found that previous experience with flooding does not necessarily bolster awareness and preparedness for future floods, homeowners and renters prepare for floods differently, and preparedness for floods is determined by perceived fear of floods and damage exposure. ( 21 ) An extensive evaluation of flood warning systems and awareness in Colorado concluded that there is a low level of public knowledge of basic flash flood information that varies by demographic group, awareness of flood risk to property is greater than risk to life, and respondents would rather be overwarned than underwarned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of risks associated with damage after a major flood event in Japan in 2000 found that major property risk factors included household characteristics such as the type of dwelling, ownership, and inundation extents. ( 20 ) A second study of this flood found that previous experience with flooding does not necessarily bolster awareness and preparedness for future floods, homeowners and renters prepare for floods differently, and preparedness for floods is determined by perceived fear of floods and damage exposure. ( 21 ) An extensive evaluation of flood warning systems and awareness in Colorado concluded that there is a low level of public knowledge of basic flash flood information that varies by demographic group, awareness of flood risk to property is greater than risk to life, and respondents would rather be overwarned than underwarned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a logistical model is applied to describe the probability of a fatal flood event with at least one death (Zhai et al, 2002), the following Equation (6) is obtained according to the goodness of fit. The Nagelkerke R 2 is 0.419, and the correct classification rate is 93 percent, according to the classification value 0.5.…”
Section: Data Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%