Risk Budget management in progressing underground works International Society for Trenchless Technology (ISTT) and International Tunnelling Association (ITA) Joint Working Group Report

Arends, Gerard; Bielecki, Rolf; Castle, John W.; Drabek, Stanislav; Haack, Alfred; Nedbal, Frantisek; Nordmark, Annica; Sterling, Ray

doi:10.1016/s0886-7798(03)00103-2

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2004, a novel model was developed by Arends et al, for prognosticating the costs of risk evaluating in underground spaces. In this research, qualitative methods are used for risk assessment (Arends et al, 2004). Duzgun and Einstein (2004) presented a model for evaluating risks in the underground coal mines of Turkey (Duzgun and Einstein, 2004).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating a Comprehensive Model for Evaluating Occupational and Environmental Risks of Dimensional Stone Mining

Yari

Bagherpour²,

Khoshouei³

et al. 2020

MGPB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the most hazardous fields of engineering is mining operations and accordingly, it requires extra consideration on risk evaluation. Decorative stone quarrying is one of the main branches of the mining industry in Iran. Currently, Iran, China and Italy are known as the three main producers of decorative stones in the world. Subsequently, risk assessment is one of the main steps of quarrying organization. One of the main steps of risk assessment is Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS). In order to achieve this goal, a comprehensive structure of dimensional stone quarrying is modelled in this research and divided into 17 main levels. One of the most useful procedures of risk ranking is Multi attribute decisionmaking methods which state that they have numerous affecting parameters. In the next step of this study, the main hazards of main decorative stone quarrying are assessed by implementing the 'Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation' (PROMETHEE) technique. As a final point, Economical, Management, and Schedule risks are determined as the most intimidating hazards in this field.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%