2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.08414
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-Averse Equilibrium for Games

Ali Yekkehkhany,
Timothy Murray,
Rakesh Nagi

Abstract: The term rational has become synonymous with maximizing expected payoff in the definition of the best response in Nash setting. In this work, we consider stochastic games in which players engage only once, or at most a limited number of times. In such games, it may not be rational for players to maximize their expected payoff as they cannot wait for the Law of Large Numbers to take effect. We instead define a new notion of a risk-averse best response, that results in a risk-averse equilibrium (RAE) in which pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 1) with social delay D W ( p * W ) = 1. However, although the expected latency along the top link is less than or equal to that of the bottom link, l 1 (m 1 ) ≤ l 2 (m 2 ), the variance of travel time along the top link at full capacity is larger than that along the bottom link, which increases the risk and uncertainty of traveling along the top link [70]- [72]. In fact, the bottom link with higher expected travel time is more likely to have a lower delay than the top link at full capacity, i.e., P L 2 (0) ≤ L 1 (n) = 0.6 > 0.5.…”
Section: A Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1) with social delay D W ( p * W ) = 1. However, although the expected latency along the top link is less than or equal to that of the bottom link, l 1 (m 1 ) ≤ l 2 (m 2 ), the variance of travel time along the top link at full capacity is larger than that along the bottom link, which increases the risk and uncertainty of traveling along the top link [70]- [72]. In fact, the bottom link with higher expected travel time is more likely to have a lower delay than the top link at full capacity, i.e., P L 2 (0) ≤ L 1 (n) = 0.6 > 0.5.…”
Section: A Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1) with social delay D W (p * W ) = 1. However, although the expected latency along the top link is less than or equal to that of the bottom link, l 1 (m 1 ) ≤ l 2 (m 2 ), the variance of travel time along the top link at full capacity is larger than that along the bottom link, which increases the risk and uncertainty of traveling along the top link (Yekkehkhany, Murray, and Nagi 2020, Yekkehkhany et al 2019. In fact, the bottom link with higher expected travel time is more likely to have a lower delay than the top link at full capacity, i.e., P L 2 (0) ≤ L 1 (n) = 0.6 > 0.5.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further research direction is that of combining the model of multidimensional congestion games with other variants of congestion games (e.g., risk-averse congestion games [31][32][33][34] and congestion games with link failures [35][36][37]).…”
Section: Conclusion and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%