2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of exposure to indoor aerosols associated with Chinese cooking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
77
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, without this knowledge, it remains difficult to raise alarm about UFPs produced by home heating systems when cooking and smoking are much stronger sources. A recent study has made progress in the area of indoor particle composition (See and Balasubramanian, 2006), and suggests that aerosols produced during gas cooking may contain toxic metals. However, this study examined exposures in a commercial kitchen and may not adequately reflect in-home exposures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, without this knowledge, it remains difficult to raise alarm about UFPs produced by home heating systems when cooking and smoking are much stronger sources. A recent study has made progress in the area of indoor particle composition (See and Balasubramanian, 2006), and suggests that aerosols produced during gas cooking may contain toxic metals. However, this study examined exposures in a commercial kitchen and may not adequately reflect in-home exposures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suggested indoor sources and activities related to Cu are cooking and frying (See and Balasubramanian, 2006) (using Cu-containing pots and frying pans) and use of electrical appliances (e.g. vacuum cleaners and hairdriers).…”
Section: Personal Exposure V Indoor and Outdoor Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was thus clear that the exposure of the vehicle inspection workers and other personnel working in the factories, and possibly the customers, to the fine particles with toxic metal contents is of serious concern. In addition, these fine particles can absorb a host of other harmful pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and nitrated PAHs because of their large specific surface area, thus further increasing the health risk for exposed individuals (See and Balasubramanian, 2006). Appropriate safe particulate guideline should be established to protect these workers, and effective protective measures are suggested to reduce their exposure levels, such as wearing a mask and protective clothing.…”
Section: Human Health Risk Assessment Of Exposure To Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further evaluate the exposure of vehicle inspection workers to metals, their occupational exposure levels were compared with three standards/guidelines for inhalation exposure to metals, which are: (1) the threshold limit valuestime weighted average (TLV-TWA) recommended by the American Conference of Industrial Hygienists (denoted as TLV in the table), (2) the permissible exposure limit-time weighted average (PEL-TWA) regulated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (PEL), (3) the tolerable concentration in air (TCA) proposed by Research for Man and Environment (RIVM) (See and Balasubramanian, 2006). The standards were used as benchmarks for assessing the acceptable levels of the concentrations of airborne metals for vehicle inspection workers.…”
Section: Concentrations Of Pm and Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%