Personal exposure to PM 2.5 and PM 1 , together with indoor and residential outdoor levels, was measured in the general adult population (30 subjects, 23-51 years of age) of Gothenburg, Sweden. Simultaneously, urban background concentrations of PM 2.5 were monitored with an EPA WINS impactor. The 24-h samples were gravimetrically analyzed for mass concentration and black smoke (BS) using a smokestain reflectometer. Median levels of PM 2.5 were 8.4 mg/m 3 (personal), 8.6 mg/m 3 (indoor), 6.4 mg/m 3 (residential outdoor), and 5.6 mg/m 3 (urban background). Personal exposure to PM 1 was 5.4 mg/m 3 , while PM 1 indoor and outdoor levels were 6.2 and 5.2 mg/m 3 , respectively. In non-smokers, personal exposure to PM 2.5 was significantly higher than were residential outdoor levels. BS absorption coefficients were fairly similar for all microenvironments (0.4-0.5 10 À5 m À1 ). Personal exposure to particulate matter (PM) and BS was well correlated with indoor levels, and there was an acceptable agreement between personal exposure and urban background concentrations for PM 2.5 and BS 2.5 (r s ¼ 0.61 and 0.65, respectively). PM 1 made up a considerable amount (70-80%) of PM 2.5 in all microenvironments. Levels of BS were higher outdoors than indoors and higher during the fall compared with spring. The correlations between particle mass and BS for both PM 2.5 vs. BS 2.5 and PM 1 versus BS 1 were weak for all microenvironments including personal exposure. The urban background station provided a good estimate of residential outdoor levels of PM 2.5 and BS 2.5 within the city (r s ¼ 0.90 and 0.77, respectively). Outdoor levels were considerably affected by long-range transported air pollution, which was not found for personal exposure or indoor levels. The within-individual (day-today) variability dominated for personal exposure to both PM 2.5 and BS 2.5 in non-smokers.
IntroductionEpidemiological studies have shown associations between exposure to fine particles and health effects, such as increased mortality, cardiovascular diseases, and respiratory illness (Samet et al., 2000;Pope et al., 2002;Brunekreef and Holgate, 2002). In terms of the overall health burden, a significant reduction in the life expectancy of the average population has been linked to long-term exposure to high levels of particulate air pollution. A systematic review by the World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed that longterm effects of exposure to particulate matter (PM) outweigh short-term effects when it comes to matters of public health significance, and should consequently be the main concern; however, acute effects are also considerable (World Health Organization, 2004). The risk of various health effects following exposure to PM has been shown to increase with exposure, and there is today no evidence of a threshold level regarding the relation between exposure and health outcomes (World Health Organization, 2005). The air quality guidelines for PM 2.5 suggested by the WHO expert group are 10 mg/m 3 as an annual mean and 25 mg/m 3 as a 2...