1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00216233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of dermal exposure of greenhouse workers to pesticides after re-entry

Abstract: On 18 farms for rose culture in greenhouses in The Netherlands, dermal exposure of hands and forearms to abamectin (avermectin B1), dodemorph (4-cyclododecyl-2,6-dimethylmorpholinium acetate) and bupirimate (5-butyl-2-(ethylamino)-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl dimethylsulphate) was measured during crop activities. Dermal exposure during cutting (75 workers) amounted to 13 micrograms/h, 1.8 mg/h, and 2.2 mg/h for abamectin, dodemorph and bupirimate, respectively. Dermal exposure to abamectin and dodemorph during sorti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value was similar to those obtained during stapling of Scindapsus treated with chlorthalonil in the same workplace (Aprea et al, 2002) but was lower than those obtained in other studies conducted by different laboratories, concerning exposures to several pesticides: during crop activities (cutting, sorting and bundling) for roses culture in greenhouses a transfer factor of 1200, 4550 and 2400 cm 2 /h was estimated for abamectin, dodemorph and bupirimate, respectively (Brouwer et al, 1992c). During mechanical tomato harvesting a transfer factor of 40 cm 2 /h were reported from undershirt analysis, whereas a value of about 450 cm 2 /h was obtained from potential skin exposure data (Spencer et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This value was similar to those obtained during stapling of Scindapsus treated with chlorthalonil in the same workplace (Aprea et al, 2002) but was lower than those obtained in other studies conducted by different laboratories, concerning exposures to several pesticides: during crop activities (cutting, sorting and bundling) for roses culture in greenhouses a transfer factor of 1200, 4550 and 2400 cm 2 /h was estimated for abamectin, dodemorph and bupirimate, respectively (Brouwer et al, 1992c). During mechanical tomato harvesting a transfer factor of 40 cm 2 /h were reported from undershirt analysis, whereas a value of about 450 cm 2 /h was obtained from potential skin exposure data (Spencer et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The effect of the spraying season was primarily observed for the workers who had not used gloves during re-entry activities when performing nonspraying job tasks involving high-dermal exposure, such as nipping, cutting, pricking, and potting. These findings agree with the generally accepted assumption that exposure to pesticides during re-entry activities mostly occurs through the hands and forearms, pesticides being taken up either percutaneously or orally (3)(4)(5). Although we could not show any clear effects of smoking on chromosome aberrations in general, the greenhouse workers who had not used protective gloves and were current smokers showed a much higher risk ratio of chromatid gaps than the nonsmokers did.…”
Section: Gaps -supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Hence the actual exposure of greenhouse workers probably occurs in re-entry activities such as cutting and trimming cultures recently treated with pesticides. The main route of uptake is through the skin, in particular on the hands and forearms, and some exposure may also occur orally (3)(4)(5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categorization of workers by van Hemmen (1992), according to work activity, environment and application techniques, represents the most thorough analysis to date of exposure variability within and across mixer/loader and applicator groups.…”
Section: Worker Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%