2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10880-006-9025-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk and Resistance Factors for Psychological Distress in Icelandic Parents of Chronically Ill Children: An Application of Wallander and Varni’s Disability-Stress-Coping Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forest plot for insecure attachment (Figure 2) shows that mean effect sizes for individual studies ranged from ̂ = -.36 (Guðmundsdóttir et al, 2006) to ̂ = .91 (Currier et al, 2012). 91% of effect sizes lie between ̂ = -.05 and ̂ = .57 showing that both Guðmundsdóttir et al (2006) and Currier et al (2012) are exceptions in the strength of effect size compared to other studies. The overall population effect size was a modest ̂ = .26 ( Table 2).…”
Section: Insecure and Secure Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The forest plot for insecure attachment (Figure 2) shows that mean effect sizes for individual studies ranged from ̂ = -.36 (Guðmundsdóttir et al, 2006) to ̂ = .91 (Currier et al, 2012). 91% of effect sizes lie between ̂ = -.05 and ̂ = .57 showing that both Guðmundsdóttir et al (2006) and Currier et al (2012) are exceptions in the strength of effect size compared to other studies. The overall population effect size was a modest ̂ = .26 ( Table 2).…”
Section: Insecure and Secure Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anxious attachment effect sizes ranged from ̂ = -.36 (Guðmundsdóttir et al, 2006) to ̂ = .59 (Cohen et al, 2011). The overall population effect size was a modest ̂ = .26 (Table 2).…”
Section: Anxious and Avoidant Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To manage stress related to their children's chronic diseases, parents have to make a greater effort referred to as coping. Guᵭmundsdóttir et al (2006) studied parents of chronically ill children to reveal mostly emotional coping in 30% of them, stress avoidance in 19% and rational coping in 8%. In families of children with diabetes, Auslander et al (1993) found one year after the diagnosis had been made that the most useful coping strategy leading to maintaining of family integration were cooperation in the family and an optimistic definition of the situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%