Risk and Resilience Ecological Framework for Assessment and Goal Formulation

Parental Perceptions of Family Centered Care in Medical Homes of Children with Neurodevelopmental Disabilities

“…The FCC-SAT has only basic, expert driven research validity, although the questionnaire was developed with substantive parent input and the current results are supported by strong consistency in all parents' responses. The study results were not analyzed by race/ethnicity because such analyses require an in-depth examination regarding participants' correlations between race/ethnicity and income [83], and will be addressed in a separate study [84]. Finally, the findings were also derived from a unique, small sample of participants, limiting the generalizability.…”

Comprehensive assessment of youth violence in five Caribbean countries: Gender and age differences

“…As such, the beliefs and interactions were based largely on their perceptions of right or wrong, or the value and purpose of each system in meeting specific needs (symbolic interaction); this also affects the perceived strengths they possess or gleans from certain systemic interaction (Corcoran & Nichols-Casebolt, 2004). This also affects the perceived strengths they believe they have or glean from interacting within any given system.…”

“…This allows for the examination of different types of resilience grouped by risk and protective factors with the belief that by identifying these factors and reciprocal influences caused through an additive or moderating effect, one can disrupt risk chains to affect individuals as well as communal change. The Resilience theory offers an organizational framework to help forecast how healthy systems recover and face risk as observed in human behavior (Bernard, 2014;Corcoran & Nichols-Casebolt, 2004;Smith-Osborne, 2007;Ungar, 2013). The theory of social control helped to determine factors of social bonding influencing risk and protective factors to infuse forms of formal and informal control by persons in various systems (Hirschi, 1969).…”

Evaluation of the High School Relationship Curriculum Connections: Dating and Emotions

“…Stress associated with peer or dating relationships can interfere with developmental progress (Kerpelman et al 2009). The literature identifies personal and family characteristics that are associated with increased risk for, or protection against, undesirable relationship outcomes such as unwanted pregnancy, abuse in relationships, and difficulty establishing an intimate relationship (Corcoran and Nichols-Casebolt 2004;Fraser 2004). Personal and family characteristics hypothesized to influence attitudes about relationships, inter-personal behavior and relationship outcomes include gender, academic performance, self-esteem, and parental divorce history (e.g., Resnick et al 2004).…”