Risco cardiovascular na hipertensão do avental branco: avaliação do Índice Tornozelo Braquial

Abstract

The vascular changes are secondary clinical complications of high blood pressure which can compromise the functional capacity and increase the risk of mortality. The Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) is an instrument used as a marker of peripheral occlusive arterial disease which has attracted broad scientific and clinical interest. According to guidelines for clinical practice, ABI values ≤0.9 or ≥1.3 are considered pathological and associated with a high incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This descriptive and cross-sectional study aimed at identifying cardiovascular risk in white coat hypertension by determining the ABI through the use of automatic oscillometric sphygmomanometers. The study was performed in a municipality located in the northeastern of the state of São Paulo, from August 2010 to June 2011. Participants were divided into normotensive, hypertensive, and white coat hypertensive subjects, classified according to the medical diagnosis and outcome of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM). The variables investigated were: age, color of skin, marital family situation, nationality, level of education, occupation, weight, height, waist circumference, ankle-brachial blood pressure and ABI. The calculation of ABI was performed by the ratio between the higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) of the posterior tibial artery and the highest systolic brachial artery. Descriptive analyzes were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences Statistical Package-SPSS, version 15.0. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for repeated measures and Tukey test for multiple comparisons of means. The degree of linear relationship in the scores of SBP and ABI was verified by using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The results were expressed as means ± standard errors of the mean (SEM), and the differences were considered statistically significant at p<0.05. The study included 135 subjects, 37% normotensive, 37% hypertensive and 26% white coat hypertensive subjects. In all groups, most participants are female, white, live with the spouse, from the state of São Paulo, housewives and have incomplete elementary education. White coat hypertensive subjects have intermediate risk in the analysis of all clinical variables studied. Although no significant difference was found in the analysis of ABI values in the comparison of groups, changes consistent with peripheral occlusive arterial disease and arterial calcification was observed only in the groups with hypertensive and white coat hypertensive subjects. The analysis of the lower ABI value showed that 10% of hypertensive subjects and 5.7% of whitecoat hypertensive subjects had ABI≤0.9 and 6% of hypertensive subjects and 11.4% of white-coat hypertensive subjects had ABI>1.3. There is a negative correlation between SBP and ABI in the groups of hypertensive and white coat hypertensive subjects. These findings relate to the premise that white coat hypertension should not be understood as a benign condition, being characterized by a clinical conditio...