2012
DOI: 10.1137/110848852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigidity of Frameworks Supported on Surfaces

Abstract: Abstract. A theorem of Laman gives a combinatorial characterisation of the graphs that admit a realisation as a minimally rigid generic bar-joint framework in R 2 . A more general theory is developed for frameworks in R 3 whose vertices are constrained to move on a two-dimensional smooth submanifold M. Furthermore, when M is a union of concentric spheres, or a union of parallel planes or a union of concentric cylinders, necessary and sufficient combinatorial conditions are obtained for the minimal rigidity of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will introduce some definitions from the theory of structural rigidity; we have adapted them from the standard ones to be more suited to our particular application of algebraic curves embedded in an ambient Euclidean space. The reader may consult [1] and [16] for some background, although we will not assume the reader has knowledge of this area and we define the terminology used in the paper below. Definition 2.18 (Framework).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will introduce some definitions from the theory of structural rigidity; we have adapted them from the standard ones to be more suited to our particular application of algebraic curves embedded in an ambient Euclidean space. The reader may consult [1] and [16] for some background, although we will not assume the reader has knowledge of this area and we define the terminology used in the paper below. Definition 2.18 (Framework).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rigidity of frameworks on surfaces [11,16] (particularly on a cylinder) provides geometric motivation for the study of M * (2, 2). In particular the question of global rigidity-when a geometric realisation of a graph on a cylinder is unique (up to ambient motions).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the (k, l)-tight graph is simple, they still induce a matroid and we denote it as M * (k, l). Recursive constructions for the bases of M * (2, l) (l = 2, 1) can be found in [16,17,15]. In this paper we study circuits in M * (2,2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proofs make use of inductive characterisations of bi-coloured structure graphs, of the appropriate mixed sparsity type, together with determinations of minimal rigidity preservation for a range of coloured graph Henneberg extension moves. These new contexts in geometric rigidity theory and their combinatorial characterisations extend the analyses in: Nixon, Owen and Power [10,11] of 3-dimensional frameworks which are vertex-constrained to surfaces; Kitson and Power [7] of 2-dimensional frameworks with non-Euclidean distances; and Servatius and Whiteley [14] of 2-dimensional (Euclidean) direction-length frameworks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%