2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends

Abstract: Summary Chromosome ends, known as telomeres, have to be distinguished from DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that activate the DNA damage checkpoint. In budding yeast, the ATM homolog Tel1 associates preferentially with short telomeres and promotes telomere addition. Here we show that the telomeric proteins Rif1 and Rif2 attenuate Tel1 recruitment to DNA ends through distinct mechanisms. Both Rif1 and Rif2 inhibit the localization of Tel1, but not the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) complex, to adjacent DNA ends. Rif1 fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
206
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
12
206
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We concluded that telomeres can be maintained by telomerase alone in sae2D sgs1D cells, but recombination also contributes to elongate telomeres in these cells. We next asked whether telomerase activity is sensitive to the negative regulation by Rif2, which competes with Tel1 binding at telomeres 27,44 , in the combined absence of Sae2 and Sgs1. We monitored the telomere length of sae2D sgs1D rif2D clones as described in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We concluded that telomeres can be maintained by telomerase alone in sae2D sgs1D cells, but recombination also contributes to elongate telomeres in these cells. We next asked whether telomerase activity is sensitive to the negative regulation by Rif2, which competes with Tel1 binding at telomeres 27,44 , in the combined absence of Sae2 and Sgs1. We monitored the telomere length of sae2D sgs1D rif2D clones as described in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the action of Rap1/Rif2 limits MRX binding at de novo telomeres 23,24 , whereas Rap1/Rif1 supports the protection function of the CST complex by a yet unknown mechanism 25 . The MRX complex also plays a key role in targeting telomerase to short telomeres 26 by recruiting Tel1 via specific interaction with a conserved motif in the Xrs2 C-terminus [26][27][28] . Finally, owing to a high GC content and the presence of stable protein/DNA complexes, telomeres are a challenge for the replication machinery that might become dependent on a specific set of proteins to avoid fork collapse in telomeric repeats 6,29 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of elongation is regulated by the numberof Rap1/Rif1/Rif2 proteins that are bound to telomeres in dependence of their length (Marcand et al 1997). Mechanistically, this may involve the competition of Rif1/ 2 with Tel1 for binding of the carboxyl terminus of Xrs2 (Hirano et al 2009). Thus, at short telomeres that bind less Rap1/Rif/Rif2, Tel1 recruitment to the MRX complex may be favored, leading to preferential recruitment and activation of telomerase at short telomeres (Fig.…”
Section: Telomere Replicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rif2 physically interacts with MRX in vitro (26) and inhibits MRXdependent 5=-end resection at telomeres (6,7). Furthermore, the lack of Rif2 enhances MRX and Tel1 association at telomeres (7,26), suggesting that Rif2 regulates nucleolytic processing of telomeres by inhibiting MRX recruitment. However, the artificial tethering of Rif2 at DNA ends leads to decreased Tel1 binding, but not MRX binding, to these ends (26), indicating that Rif2 counteracts Tel1 association to DNA ends.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%