2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0837-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Richness–productivity relationships between trophic levels in a detritus-based system: significance of abundance and trophic linkage

Abstract: Most theoretical and empirical studies of productivity-species richness relationships fail to consider linkages among trophic levels. We quantified productivity-richness relationships in detritus-based, water-filled tree-hole communities for two trophic levels: invertebrate consumers and the protozoans on which they feed. By analogy to theory for biomass partitioning among trophic levels, we predicted that consumer control would result in richness of protozoans in the lower trophic level being unaffected by in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and 2). Protozoans often are important prey for mosquito larvae (Conchran-Stafira and von Ende 1998, Eisenberg et al 2000, Kaufman et al 2002, Kneitel 2007, Yee et al 2007c, although there are no data testing whether protozoans affect patterns of oviposition. Gravid females of several species of container mosquitoes prefer substrates with bacteria for oviposition (Maw 1970, Ikeshoji et al 1975, Trexler et al 2003, and our data identified bacterial productivity (PS) as important for both early and late instars of Aedes during spring (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 and 2). Protozoans often are important prey for mosquito larvae (Conchran-Stafira and von Ende 1998, Eisenberg et al 2000, Kaufman et al 2002, Kneitel 2007, Yee et al 2007c, although there are no data testing whether protozoans affect patterns of oviposition. Gravid females of several species of container mosquitoes prefer substrates with bacteria for oviposition (Maw 1970, Ikeshoji et al 1975, Trexler et al 2003, and our data identified bacterial productivity (PS) as important for both early and late instars of Aedes during spring (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protozoan identifications were made based on Pennak (1989) and Foissner and Berger (1996). Similar methods for protozoans have been used in another container mosquito system (i.e., tree holes, Yee et al 2007c). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is different from mere random habitat-size-related colonization events as envisioned by Wilson (1963, 1967), however, it may result in the same pattern. Examples of comparable naturally patchy, temporal systems that are connected by the dispersal of highly mobile species are other phytotelms such as mosquitoinhabited water-filled tree holes (Yee et al 2007) or Note: Habitat size transformation is as in Table 2, P values ,0.05 shown in bold.…”
Section: What Can We Learn From Bromeliads?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Container food webs are usually simple (predators-consumers-microorganisms-detritus) (Walker et al 1991, Kitching 2000) suggesting that trophic-cascades are likely (Strong 1992). Organic detritus, mainly decomposing plant parts and arthropod carcasses, forms the base of the food web and bacteria play a key role in converting that detritus into biomass edible by consumers (Kitching 2000, Moore et al 2004, Yee et al 2007a, b). Although it is clear that detritus-derived productivity affects abundances of decomposers and consumers within natural and artificial containers (e.g., Yee et al 2007a, b; Murrell and Juliano 2008), few studies have tested the three pathways by which predators in a bacteria-bacteriovore-predator trophic system may affect bacterial abundance (see Costa and Vonesh 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%