Richness of non-timber forest products in Himalayan communities—diversity, distribution, use pattern and conservation status

Abstract

Background Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are important resources for sustenance of rural communities; a systematic planning to manage diverse NTFPs may immensely contribute to food and livelihood security of forest dwellers. Considering this, the present study has been undertaken in the Himachal Pradesh state in north India. It aims to provide detailed information on diversity, distribution, use pattern, and conservation status of selected NTFPs that have market potential, and suggest a possible way for their sustained management and possible role in livelihood upgradation of dependent communities. Methodology An inventory of NTFP species was prepared by collecting secondary information from published scientific studies in journals, books, and other periodicals as well as species being traded as per Forest department records. Search on various online databases were also used (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, ISI Web of Science) using specific search terms such as “non-timber forest products,” “NTFPs,” “medicinal plants,” “wild edible plants,” and “Himachal Pradesh,” “Western Himalaya,” and “Northwest Himalaya.” A list of potential NTFPs was prepared having market value. To evaluate the relative usefulness of different species, a quantitative valuation was also used by calculating various indices, such as use value (UV), relative frequency of citation (RFC), relative importance index (RI), cultural importance index (CI), and cultural value (CV). Results A total of 811 species have been screened that has significant potential for the State, and categorized in 18 groups as per their use. The family use value was highest for Asteraceae (FUV = 76.75). Among plant parts used, whole plants, roots (including rhizomes and tubers), leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds, stems, and barks were used by the forest dwellers. Maximum NTFPs were collected from the warm temperate zone, followed by the temperate, sub-alpine, sub-tropical, and alpine zones. Sixty-one percent of species had medicinal importance, followed by species used for food and fodder purposes. Although species richness of medicinal plants decreased with altitude, however, most plants extracted from high altitudes were high-value species fetching better income. As many as 125 NTFPs were identified under the diverse level of threats according to IUCN criteria and as per the local stakeholders’ perceptions. Conclusion High dependence on NTFPs by poor and marginal communities for domestic needs as well as market demand of selected species leads to create excessive pressure on them. Unfortunately, the state agencies are not having any robust conservation plan for NTFPs. For long-term management of NTFPs sector, a species-specific conservation strategy, proper harvesting protocol, cultivation practices, the supply of quality planting material, product development and diversification, value chain development, and ensured market is greatly desired. This will not only lead to conserving NTFPs resources in their natural habitats but also lead a sustainable livelihood generation for forest dwellers.

Himalayan ecosystem services and climate change driven agricultural frontiers: a scoping review

“…Species richness of plants that provide NFTPs is lower at higher altitudes, however they are higher-value and provide a higher profit compared to NFTPs at lower altitudes. [ 37 , 39 ]. This is especially true for medicinal plant harvests for local use as well as exports [ 37 ].…”

Socio-economic factors affecting the use of non-timber forest products in swine production in the Colombian Amazon

“…From this fact, it can be inferred that pig production units did not take advantage of the NTFP in contexts where the sources of financing (EF10, EF11) and the type of technical assistance (EF7) are limited and insufficient for the implementation of new production practices. In this regard, Lopes et al (2019) and Masoodi et al (2020) stated that agricultural activities carry out exploitation of NTFPs in proportion to the dis- tance from the forest, undermining the conservation role of environmentally important areas, where poor and marginal communities lack elements for forest utilization and improvement of living conditions.…”

Forest-based livelihood choices and their determinants in Western Kenya

“…The results show that being a member in forest user group positively influenced extraction decisions. This association could be as result of sharing of information on the opportunities for forest extraction (Paumgarten 2005;Langat et al 2016;Masoodi and Sundriyal 2020). Equally, the collective performance of forest extraction activities can lower transaction costs therefore Low income (wealth index -1), middle income (1 < wealth index < -1), and high income (wealth index !…”