2014
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbt041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rice, irrigation and downside risk: a quantile analysis of risk exposure and mitigation on Korean farms

Abstract: This article develops a new quantile approach utilizing partial moments to evaluate risk exposure and illustrate risk valuation, and then applies it to examine the potential importance of 'fat tails', downside risk, and risk mitigation options associated with a highly controlled but stochastic production system − irrigated rice production in Korea. The econometric approach exploits a rich panel dataset to develop consistent and robust econometric estimates of the partial moments needed to implement the quantil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
15
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Joint adoption reduces the cost of risk by 9% of the mean maize yield compared to non-adoption under moderate risk aversion (b = 2). Similar to the results of Kim et al (2014), our findings show that the cost of risk comes from exposure to downside risk and that this cost is quite large. The contribution of downside risk to the cost of risk is higher for non-adoption than adoption of SIPs (Figures 4b-d).…”
Section: Impact Of Sips Adoption On Downside Risk and The Cost Of Risksupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Joint adoption reduces the cost of risk by 9% of the mean maize yield compared to non-adoption under moderate risk aversion (b = 2). Similar to the results of Kim et al (2014), our findings show that the cost of risk comes from exposure to downside risk and that this cost is quite large. The contribution of downside risk to the cost of risk is higher for non-adoption than adoption of SIPs (Figures 4b-d).…”
Section: Impact Of Sips Adoption On Downside Risk and The Cost Of Risksupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar to the results of Kim et al . (), our findings show that the cost of risk comes from exposure to downside risk and that this cost is quite large. The contribution of downside risk to the cost of risk is higher for non‐adoption than adoption of SIPs (Figures b–d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, downside risk refers to the risk located in the lower tail of the payoff distribution (Kim et al 2014). While useful information about the risk effects of input adjustments can be obtained from understanding their impact on yield variance, analyzing the variance effect alone would not help differentiate between unexpected bad and good events (Di Falco and Veronesi 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%