Rhizobia from Lanzarote, the Canary Islands, That Nodulate
Phaseolus vulgaris
Have Characteristics in Common with
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Isolates from Mainland Spain
Abstract:The stable, low-molecular-weight (LMW) RNA fractions of several rhizobial isolates of Phaseolus vulgaris grown in the soil of Lanzarote, an island of the Canary Islands, were identical to a less-common pattern found within Sinorhizobium meliloti (assigned to group II) obtained from nodules of alfalfa and alfalfa-related legumes grown in northern Spain. The P. vulgaris isolates and the group II LMW RNA S. meliloti isolates also were distinguishable in that both had two conserved inserts of 20 and 46 bp in the 1… Show more
“…C. arietinum can be nodulated by strains of several species of Mesorhizobium, but all of them carry nearly identical nodC genes and belong to the symbiovar ciceri Laranjo et al, 2008). In contrast, P. vulgaris is very promiscuous, and can be nodulated by different symbiovars that carry very divergent symbiotic genes (Michiels et al, 1998;Zurdo-Piñeiro et al, 2009). The study of the promiscuity degree of legumes deserves more investigations to fill the the lack of knowledge about all the endosymbionts able to nodulate each legume.…”
Section: Host Range Of Rhizobia and Legume Promiscuitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The nod genes of the operon nodABC are determinants of the host range (Winsor 1989;Györgypal et al, 1991;Relic et al, 1994;Roche et al, 1996;Perret et al, 2000). Within these genes, the nodC has been widely analyzed in Downloaded by [Istanbul Universitesi Kutuphane ve Dok] at 14:48 05 November 2014 rhizobial strains and found to be related not only with the host range of rhizobia but also with the promiscuity degree of the hosts (Roche et al, 1996;Perret et al, 2000;Laguerre et al, 2001;Rivas et al, 2007;Iglesias et al, 2007;Zurdo-Piñeiro et al, 2009, Ruíz-Díez et al, 2012a. The analysis of this gene allowed confirmation that P. vulgaris is a very promiscuous host as it can be nodulated by several divergent nodC symbiovars such as phaseoli, gallicum, giardinii and mediterranense, and that C. arietinum is a very resctrictive host as it can be nodulated only by the symbiovar ciceri (Table 3).…”
Section: The Concept Of Promiscuity In the Rhizobia-legumementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has been known for many years that legumes have different promiscuity degrees. Whereas some of them can be nodulated by several species of rhizobia such as Macroptilium or Phaseolus Michiels et al, 1998;Zurdo-Piñeiro et al, 2009;García-Fraile et al, 2010), others are restrictive hosts for nodulation such as Cicer, Trifolium or Vicia (Broughton and Perret 1999). In the same way, rhizobial strains can have a broad or a narrow host range.…”
Section: The Concept Of Promiscuity In the Rhizobia-legumementioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, Vicia and Trifolium are restrictive hosts and there are no cross-nodulation abilities between biovars viciae and trifolii; however, strains of these two biovars can nodulate the legume host of the biovar phaseoli because Phaseolus is a promiscuous legume. For this reason the suitability of the definition of biovars affecting this type of legumes has been discussed (Zurdo-Piñeiro et al, 2009). This point can be solved by using a phylogenetic criterion based on the nodC gene analysis which makes it possible to clearly distinguish the biovars viciae, trifolii and phaseoli (García-Fraile et al, 2010).…”
Section: Former Biovars Based On the Cross Inoculation Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in the biovar medicaginis of E. meliloti, nodC gene sequence analysis supported the existence of this biovar defined on the basis of nodA gene analysis (Bailly et al, 2007). The nodC gene was used, for instance, to define the biovar mediterranense that include strains of E. fredii and E. meliloti able to nodulate Phaseolus, but not Medicago (Mnasri et al, 2007), or the new biovar lancerottense that was recently described within E. meliloti to include the strains able to nodulate Lotus endemic of Canary Islands (León-Barrios et al, 2009). These strains harbour a nodC gene phylogenetically unrelated to those carried by other E. meliloti biovars and by M. loti.…”
Section: Former Biovars Based On the Cross Inoculation Groupsmentioning
“…C. arietinum can be nodulated by strains of several species of Mesorhizobium, but all of them carry nearly identical nodC genes and belong to the symbiovar ciceri Laranjo et al, 2008). In contrast, P. vulgaris is very promiscuous, and can be nodulated by different symbiovars that carry very divergent symbiotic genes (Michiels et al, 1998;Zurdo-Piñeiro et al, 2009). The study of the promiscuity degree of legumes deserves more investigations to fill the the lack of knowledge about all the endosymbionts able to nodulate each legume.…”
Section: Host Range Of Rhizobia and Legume Promiscuitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The nod genes of the operon nodABC are determinants of the host range (Winsor 1989;Györgypal et al, 1991;Relic et al, 1994;Roche et al, 1996;Perret et al, 2000). Within these genes, the nodC has been widely analyzed in Downloaded by [Istanbul Universitesi Kutuphane ve Dok] at 14:48 05 November 2014 rhizobial strains and found to be related not only with the host range of rhizobia but also with the promiscuity degree of the hosts (Roche et al, 1996;Perret et al, 2000;Laguerre et al, 2001;Rivas et al, 2007;Iglesias et al, 2007;Zurdo-Piñeiro et al, 2009, Ruíz-Díez et al, 2012a. The analysis of this gene allowed confirmation that P. vulgaris is a very promiscuous host as it can be nodulated by several divergent nodC symbiovars such as phaseoli, gallicum, giardinii and mediterranense, and that C. arietinum is a very resctrictive host as it can be nodulated only by the symbiovar ciceri (Table 3).…”
Section: The Concept Of Promiscuity In the Rhizobia-legumementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has been known for many years that legumes have different promiscuity degrees. Whereas some of them can be nodulated by several species of rhizobia such as Macroptilium or Phaseolus Michiels et al, 1998;Zurdo-Piñeiro et al, 2009;García-Fraile et al, 2010), others are restrictive hosts for nodulation such as Cicer, Trifolium or Vicia (Broughton and Perret 1999). In the same way, rhizobial strains can have a broad or a narrow host range.…”
Section: The Concept Of Promiscuity In the Rhizobia-legumementioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, Vicia and Trifolium are restrictive hosts and there are no cross-nodulation abilities between biovars viciae and trifolii; however, strains of these two biovars can nodulate the legume host of the biovar phaseoli because Phaseolus is a promiscuous legume. For this reason the suitability of the definition of biovars affecting this type of legumes has been discussed (Zurdo-Piñeiro et al, 2009). This point can be solved by using a phylogenetic criterion based on the nodC gene analysis which makes it possible to clearly distinguish the biovars viciae, trifolii and phaseoli (García-Fraile et al, 2010).…”
Section: Former Biovars Based On the Cross Inoculation Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in the biovar medicaginis of E. meliloti, nodC gene sequence analysis supported the existence of this biovar defined on the basis of nodA gene analysis (Bailly et al, 2007). The nodC gene was used, for instance, to define the biovar mediterranense that include strains of E. fredii and E. meliloti able to nodulate Phaseolus, but not Medicago (Mnasri et al, 2007), or the new biovar lancerottense that was recently described within E. meliloti to include the strains able to nodulate Lotus endemic of Canary Islands (León-Barrios et al, 2009). These strains harbour a nodC gene phylogenetically unrelated to those carried by other E. meliloti biovars and by M. loti.…”
Section: Former Biovars Based On the Cross Inoculation Groupsmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.