2021
DOI: 10.24815/siele.v8i2.19118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhetorical structure in the problem statement section of Iranian postgraduate students' research projects

Abstract: This paper reports the results of a study that investigated the structure of the Problem Statement (PS) section, following Swales’ (1990) Create-A-Research-Space (CARS) model as the first objective. Move analysis was used to analyze the rhetorical moves of the PS sections of the research projects. The second objective was the identification of the specific types of linguistic features associated with each move and step based on Pho’s (2013) classification. Following Pho (2013), the linguistic features as impor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Move 1 dominates their background and this is similar to the result of Afrizon, Arsyad, and Zahrida (2018) that in their study Move 1 also dominates the introduction sections. Tarvirdizdeh and Nimehchisalem (2021) also have similar findings that the highest frequency in the occurrence of moves is Move 1. In Move 2, students tended to skip the steps for indicating a gap or adding what is known related to their topic or problems.…”
Section: Rhetorical Moves In Efl Students' Background Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Move 1 dominates their background and this is similar to the result of Afrizon, Arsyad, and Zahrida (2018) that in their study Move 1 also dominates the introduction sections. Tarvirdizdeh and Nimehchisalem (2021) also have similar findings that the highest frequency in the occurrence of moves is Move 1. In Move 2, students tended to skip the steps for indicating a gap or adding what is known related to their topic or problems.…”
Section: Rhetorical Moves In Efl Students' Background Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…So far, none of the Islamic boarding schools has touched on neuroscience-based learning, even though this is very important in maximizing brain function, more than that, neuroscience has become a tool in curriculum development. 30 Incorporating subjects on reason (neuroscience) into the curriculum of Islamic educational institutions, especially in Arabic subjects into learning that is in the boarding school is very useful to improve the intelligence of students. With a neuroscience approach, such as multiple intelligences, brain-based learning, quantum learning, and quantum teaching as a contribution to neuroscience for Arabic language education.…”
Section: Application Of Brain Intelligence-based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%