2010
DOI: 10.1353/rap.2010.0206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhetoric and the Origins of the Canadian Medicare System

Abstract: During the last half of the twentieth century, every developed country embarked on efforts to provide affordable, high-quality health care to its citizens. For both cultural and structural reasons, these efforts were especially challenging for Canada. In this essay we employ a combination of traditional rhetorical analysis and Sophistic conceptions of mētis (or apatê) to examine the origins of the Canadian Medicare system. We focus on the key rhetorical acts that transformed the rhetorical situations faced by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This opportunity also makes it possible to contribute to the decolonization of Canada, a process envisioned by Macdonald (2013) as Indigenizing Canada's political discourse. Shaping public perceptions is an important part of political practice, and its application to Canadian health care has been analyzed in terms of rhetoric by Conrad and Cudahy (2010), demonstrating the importance of framing the debate in a way that validates one's case and connects with clearly targeted audiences. This is a resource-heavy process (think tanks, foundations, journals, etc.)…”
Section: Working On the Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This opportunity also makes it possible to contribute to the decolonization of Canada, a process envisioned by Macdonald (2013) as Indigenizing Canada's political discourse. Shaping public perceptions is an important part of political practice, and its application to Canadian health care has been analyzed in terms of rhetoric by Conrad and Cudahy (2010), demonstrating the importance of framing the debate in a way that validates one's case and connects with clearly targeted audiences. This is a resource-heavy process (think tanks, foundations, journals, etc.)…”
Section: Working On the Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%