2020
DOI: 10.3390/polym12092014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheology and 3D Printability of Percolated Graphene–Polyamide-6 Composites

Abstract: Graphene–polyamide-6 (PA6) composites with up to 17.0%·w/w graphene content were prepared via melt mixing. Oscillatory rheometry revealed that the dynamic viscoelastic properties of PA6 decreased with the addition of 0.1%·w/w graphene but increased when the graphene content was increased to 6.0%·w/w and higher. Further analysis indicated that the rheological percolation threshold was between 6.0 and 10.0%·w/w graphene. The Carreau–Yasuda model was used to describe the complex viscosity of the materials. Capill… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(60 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This range is broader than previously reported [ 60 ], in particular, the upper limit. The greater complex viscosity could be attributed to the impeded polymer mobility as a consequence of the increased drug–filler–matrix interactions [ 68 ]. The lower viscosity of 45% HPC (F10 and F11) compared to 67.5% HPC (F1 and F2) may be linked to the reduced Tg of the blends (Tg of HPC [ 55 ], SLP [ 69 ] and PVP/VA [ 52 ] = 120, 70 and 104 °C, respectively) and the decreased polymeric chain interaction [ 47 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This range is broader than previously reported [ 60 ], in particular, the upper limit. The greater complex viscosity could be attributed to the impeded polymer mobility as a consequence of the increased drug–filler–matrix interactions [ 68 ]. The lower viscosity of 45% HPC (F10 and F11) compared to 67.5% HPC (F1 and F2) may be linked to the reduced Tg of the blends (Tg of HPC [ 55 ], SLP [ 69 ] and PVP/VA [ 52 ] = 120, 70 and 104 °C, respectively) and the decreased polymeric chain interaction [ 47 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 200 °C for FDM printing, the slopes of all formulations ranged from −0.3 to −0.7, which is a broader range than in Ilyes’ work (−0.4 to −0.6) [ 51 ]. Greater shear thinning behavior or a higher slope value could be caused by the predominant interactions between the additive and polymer, and the breakage of the HPC polymer networks at a high frequency [ 68 , 82 ]. The addition of CrosPVP showed the greatest shear-thinning effect among the disintegrants upon printing (200 °C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid increase in viscosity was directly attributed to dominant polymer chain entanglement, which was promoted by the increased filler loading of graphene. [ 71 ] Although high viscosity polymers and composites can be printed in FFF, they require high print temperatures and high torque motors to push the filament through the nozzle. Without optimized parameters, this can result in poor printing quality.…”
Section: Polymer Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14,22,23] Others relate the extrusion force produced by an FDM extruder to the rheological properties of a molten polymer. [24,25] The models already available in literature do not consider differences in rheological behavior during the extrusion process of a 3D-printable ink. In a previous work, rGFRP inks showed a Newtonian behavior at lower shear rates and a pseudoplastic behavior at higher shear rates.…”
Section: Extrusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%