2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological properties of O-carboxymethyl chitosan – gum Arabic coacervates as a function of coacervation pH

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…by conducting optical rheological studies to observe structural changes during flow. Similarly observations have been made by Huang, Xiao, Wang and Qiu (2015), who found that the highest viscosity of interacting binary polymer solutions (O-carboxylmethyl chitosan with gum Arabic) was not at the pH value where maximum coacervate yield occurred, but rather at somewhat higher pH values. They argued that remaining electrostatic interactions may have contributed to the viscoelastic properties.…”
Section: Impact Of Change Of Ph On Structure Of Wpi E Pectin Dispersionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…by conducting optical rheological studies to observe structural changes during flow. Similarly observations have been made by Huang, Xiao, Wang and Qiu (2015), who found that the highest viscosity of interacting binary polymer solutions (O-carboxylmethyl chitosan with gum Arabic) was not at the pH value where maximum coacervate yield occurred, but rather at somewhat higher pH values. They argued that remaining electrostatic interactions may have contributed to the viscoelastic properties.…”
Section: Impact Of Change Of Ph On Structure Of Wpi E Pectin Dispersionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, at pH 3.0, O‐carboxymethyl chitosan (OCC) formed maximum coacervates with GA while the coacervates of the same system formed at pH 6.0 had the highest viscosity and viscoelasticity. These observations indicate that factors beyond electrostatic interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, might contribute to the rheological properties of OCC‐GA coacervates (Huang et al, 2015). Similarly, agar–whey protein coacervates formed in citrate buffer produced higher modulus values than coacervates formed in water (Rocha, Souza, Magalhães, Andrade, & Gonçalves, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Liu, Shim, Shen, Wang, & Reaney, 2017; Liu, Shim, Tse, Wang, & Reaney, 2018). Texture and overall sensory acceptability of food products are improved by designing protein–polysaccharide coacervates with preferred rheological properties (Espinosa‐Andrews, Sandoval‐Castilla, Vázquez‐Torres, Vernon‐Carter, & Lobato‐Calleros, 2010; Huang, Xiao, Wang, & Qiu, 2015). For food development and quality control it is critically important to understand protein–polysaccharide coacervate structural and rheological properties as functions of environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, a variation in viscosity was observed as the pH and mixing ratio changed, suggesting that a variation in the charge balance affected the viscosity of the microcapsule which formed by the GE‐CMC coacervate. A number of previous publications showed similar variation tendency using whey protein‐gum arabic (Weinbreck et al ., ) and carboxymethyl chitosan‐gum arabic (Huang et al ., ). In detail, a maximum viscosity was found at pH of 4.0 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%