2022
DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.14027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological and textural properties of dough made out of de‐oiled soya flour with application of different binding agents

Abstract: The present study was undertaken to check the suitability of by-products of the soyabean oil industry, that is, de-oiled soya cake for the development of soya flour dough, which could be utilized by the snack industry. As soya lacks gluten protein, which acts as a natural binder, different binding agents such as xanthan gum, guar gum, psyllium husk, and whey were used to get the desired malleable property, and their effect on the rheological and textural properties of soya flour dough was studied. The water/ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frozen doughs were completely thawed on the 0th, 7th, 14th, 21th, and 28th day after freezing, and then the textural properties of the doughs were determined using a texture analyser (Universal TA, Shanghai Teng Ba Instrument Technology Co., China) based upon the methodology of Bhattacharjee et al . (2022). The instrument parameters for the test procedure were: pre‐test speed, 3 mm s −1 ; test speed, 1 mm s −1 ; post‐test speed, 1 mm s −1 ; compression ratio, 80%; two compression intervals of 10 s each; trigger force, 5 g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frozen doughs were completely thawed on the 0th, 7th, 14th, 21th, and 28th day after freezing, and then the textural properties of the doughs were determined using a texture analyser (Universal TA, Shanghai Teng Ba Instrument Technology Co., China) based upon the methodology of Bhattacharjee et al . (2022). The instrument parameters for the test procedure were: pre‐test speed, 3 mm s −1 ; test speed, 1 mm s −1 ; post‐test speed, 1 mm s −1 ; compression ratio, 80%; two compression intervals of 10 s each; trigger force, 5 g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%