2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10578-9_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RGBD Salient Object Detection: A Benchmark and Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
484
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 488 publications
(506 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
484
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depth-pooling models This type of model combines depth saliency maps and traditional 2D saliency maps simply to obtain saliency maps for RGB-D images [19][20][21][22]. Peng et al provided a simple fusion framework that combines existing RGB-produced saliency with new depth-induced saliency: the former one is estimated from existing RGB models, whereas the latter one is based on the multi-contextual contrast model [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Depth-pooling models This type of model combines depth saliency maps and traditional 2D saliency maps simply to obtain saliency maps for RGB-D images [19][20][21][22]. Peng et al provided a simple fusion framework that combines existing RGB-produced saliency with new depth-induced saliency: the former one is estimated from existing RGB models, whereas the latter one is based on the multi-contextual contrast model [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng et al provided a simple fusion framework that combines existing RGB-produced saliency with new depth-induced saliency: the former one is estimated from existing RGB models, whereas the latter one is based on the multi-contextual contrast model [19]. Ren et al presented a two-stage 3D salient object detection framework, which first integrates the contrast region with the background, depth and orientation priors to achieve a saliency map and then reconstructs the saliency map globally [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations